The Curious Case of Baby Archie has taken another twist as doubts surrounding his birth resurface.

From strange proportions to questionable details, here are some puzzling points that have left many with quizzical eyes.

Firstly, the photographs themselves raised eyebrows.

The odd proportions were immediately noticeable, with Prince William appearing 1.5 times larger than everyone else in the frame.

Moreover, the colors and lighting seemed off, giving the whole scene a Norman Rockwell painting vibe.

It was all just so strange, but initially, it was brushed off as perhaps some peculiar British royalty thing.

Little did we know, there was more to this story.

According to an insider source, the gathering depicted in the photos never actually took place.

Instead, individuals were copy-pasted from other portraits.

And while Kate Middleton’s face remained beautiful, keen observers noticed an asymmetry.

This discovery fueled speculation about the authenticity of the images.

But that’s not all.

The source also revealed that Kate, drawing from her experience as a mother, found it unusual that two-year-old Archie appeared much older in the pictures.

Meghan Markle’s peculiar way of holding the baby further raised eyebrows, as it seemed to be an uncomfortable position for the child.

One would expect such discomfort to result in tears, yet Archie remained surprisingly calm and composed throughout the ceremony.

The strangeness continued when Meghan requested the royal photographer to send her a private file of all the photos before releasing them to the palace.

This raised suspicions about potential editing or the removal of incriminating traces.

It seems that even before the official announcement, doubts had already emerged regarding the authenticity of Archie.

Many have argued that the discrepancies in the photographs were apparent from the beginning.

The original dates on the pictures did not align with Harry and Meghan’s narrative.

Observers pointed out that the baby in the images seemed older than two months, as he was able to hold his head up independently.

Furthermore, Archie’s appearance seemed to change dramatically from one photo to another, adding to the confusion.

The missing chair leg in one of the christening photos also caught attention.

People questioned why Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, was not given a full chair, considering it was a palace, not a furniture rummage sale.

Such peculiar details only added to the overall mystery surrounding Archie’s birth.

Taking a closer look at the christening photos of Archie, Lily, and Harry, it becomes evident that many of them were manipulated using photoshop.

One particular image shows Archie supposedly being held by someone wearing royal blue, which bears a striking resemblance to a photo of Princess Diana holding baby Harry.

Meghan herself is seen wearing the same dress and hat in Lily’s photo as she did in the supposed Archie photo, while Harry dons the same grey suit and tie.

These similarities have led to further speculation and conspiracy theories.

Turning our attention to the birth announcement, inconsistencies become apparent.

On May 6, 2019, it was initially reported that Meghan had gone into labor in the early hours of the morning.

However, just 20 minutes later, it was announced that she had already given birth to Archie at 5:26 a.m.

The wording of the announcements added to the confusion, with one stating that “the Duchess of Sussex had been delivered of a son” rather than mentioning that she delivered the child herself.