The Biden administration is under scrutiny for allegedly turning a blind eye to potential falsehoods in Prince Harry’s US visa application.
Concerns arose following revelations in his memoir “Spear,” where he openly discussed past drug use involving cocaine, marijuana, and psychedelic mushrooms.
These disclosures raised eyebrows over how he was granted entry into the United States in 2020, given that US laws consider previous drug use as grounds for visa denial.
Accusations of indifference towards Prince Harry’s visa application discrepancies have sparked controversy, with the Heritage Foundation taking legal action against the Department of Homeland Security after being denied access to related information through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Cohen, speaking to GD News, expressed skepticism about the prospects of publicizing Harry’s visa details under the current Biden administration.
Despite the potential visa irregularities, President Joe Biden has commended the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for their outspokenness on various issues that challenge societal norms.
Nana Aqua, however, criticized Biden’s stance, questioning his credibility.
The Department of Homeland Security emphasized that while Harry holds a public role in the UK, he does not enjoy similar status in the US.
In his memoir, Prince Harry candidly shared insights into his drug experiences, noting that cocaine had no positive impact on him but acknowledging the different effect of marijuana.
The Heritage Foundation’s legal action highlights the general inadmissibility of individuals with such backgrounds under US immigration laws, raising concerns over the privacy of immigration-related information.
The ongoing legal battle could potentially compel the government to disclose confidential immigration details pertaining to Prince Harry, a development that the court is urged to approach cautiously.
Meanwhile, discussions about the royal couple shifted to their recent presence in Jamaica ahead of an upcoming event.
Observers noted the couple’s pursuit of new financial opportunities as a driving force behind their appearances.
Cohen remarked on Prince Harry’s willingness to engage with Jamaican officials, signaling his support for the country’s transition towards republicanism.
This move, perceived by some as disloyal, drew comparisons to the couple’s previous reception in Jamaica and raised questions about their allegiance to tradition and family ties.
The evolving narrative around Prince Harry and Meghan continues to captivate audiences, with each development shedding light on their evolving roles and aspirations.