In a recent interview with Camilla Tominey, former Prime Minister Boris Johnson opened up about his time in office, his interactions with the late Queen, and his thoughts on the ongoing saga involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

As he prepares to release his new memoir, Johnson’s reflections are sparking conversation, particularly regarding his unique relationship with the monarchy.

During their chat, Johnson reminisced about his weekly meetings with Queen Elizabeth II, which he described as a form of “free psychotherapy.” He emphasized that no matter how outrageous his confessions might have been, the Queen had likely encountered it all before.

When asked if he found her difficult to work with compared to other Prime Ministers, he praised her support and wisdom, indicating that she always offered valuable guidance without revealing her political leanings.

The conversation took a turn when Johnson was asked about his attempts to persuade Harry and Meghan to remain in the UK.

He recounted his positive experiences with the couple, noting Meghan’s articulate contributions at an event focused on female education.

Johnson expressed his belief that Harry could be a “force for good” and admitted that his efforts to discourage their departure from royal duties were ultimately unsuccessful.

Charlie Rowley, a former advisor to Michael Gove, weighed in on Johnson’s comments, describing them as entertaining yet skeptical.

Rowley noted that while Johnson had to navigate the tumultuous period of COVID-19, some of his decisions, like implementing lockdowns, contradicted his libertarian instincts.

Many, including Rowley, agree that the initial lockdown was justified, but subsequent measures faced criticism, leading Johnson to express regret.

As Johnson’s memoir is set to be a hefty read at 738 pages, there is curiosity surrounding how much self-reflection it will contain.

Questions loom regarding how much responsibility he will take for the chaos that unfolded during his tenure, particularly within the Conservative Party.

Observers are eager to see if he acknowledges the challenges of leading during such a pivotal moment in British history.

However, the most buzzworthy moment from the interview came when Johnson defended Harry and Meghan, asserting that they had been treated unfairly by the media.

His remarks caught many off guard, as the unwritten rule in British politics seems to be to avoid any praise for the Sussexes.

Johnson’s unexpected stance has left royal watchers and political commentators alike reeling.

Camilla Tominey, who was present during the interview, expressed her dismay at Johnson’s comments, accusing him of grandstanding.

She criticized him for inserting himself into what she deemed a personal matter between the royal family and the Sussexes, likening his behavior to a dramatic episode of a soap opera.

Tominey’s frustration highlights the delicate balance between public interest and the privacy that royals often seek.

Social media erupted in response to Johnson’s comments, with many users pointing out the irony of his timing.

Critics argue that with pressing issues like the cost of living crisis and NHS struggles, Johnson should focus on more pertinent matters rather than stirring the pot regarding royal affairs.

It’s almost as if he’s oblivious to the reality facing the nation, choosing instead to dive headfirst into the royal drama.

As the dust settles, it’s clear that Johnson’s remarks have reignited discussions about the Sussexes and their place within the royal family.

The palace is reportedly concerned about the implications of his comments and how they might affect the monarchy’s image amidst ongoing scrutiny.

This latest incident serves as a reminder of the fine line politicians walk when engaging with royal matters.

In the grand scheme of things, Johnson’s commentary has added yet another layer to the already complex narrative surrounding Harry and Meghan.

It raises questions about the role of former leaders in modern discourse and whether they should weigh in on such personal matters.

As the saga continues, one thing is certain: the intersection of politics and royalty is never short of drama.

With the memoir’s release on the horizon, anticipation builds around what else Johnson might reveal.

Will he delve deeper into the challenges he faced, or will he continue to deflect blame?

Regardless, the royal ruckus sparked by his recent comments assures that the spotlight will remain firmly fixed on both him and the Sussexes for the foreseeable future.