Luxury fashion houses Chanel and Hermes are reportedly considering legal action against Meghan Markle after her recent pap walk left them in a negative light.
The public image of a high-profile individual in the fashion world can either make or break a business, and unfortunately for these iconic brands, Meghan’s outfit choice has had an adverse effect.
During her latest paparazzi outing, Meghan donned a $1,625 camel-colored Max Mara Raspoli coat, a $1,225 blue-and-tan-printed Kashmir Hermes Rayeux Dette shawl, and white leggings, despite the warm 70-degree weather.
To complete her ensemble, she added black-and-tan Chanel slingbacks worth $1,150, a $450 Givenchy belt, and a white $1,650 Guyane tote.
However, instead of boosting sales for these luxury brands, Meghan’s fashion choices were met with mockery on social media.
Numerous individuals took to social platforms to express their disdain towards Meghan’s style.
Some even suggested that she should be permanently banned from Chanel and Hermes.
“What a shame Karl Lagerfeld isn’t alive to give us his thoughts.
He would absolutely hate her,” one comment read.
Another criticized her ability to make top designers look cheap and trashy, while someone else found it distasteful that she wore multiple logo designer brands simultaneously.
One user went as far as suggesting that Hermes should sue Meghan for tarnishing their reputation.
“I’m sure Hermes is thrilled that Madame is showing the world that their scarf is really supposed to look like.
Hermes should sue her,” they stated.
Others noticed that Meghan didn’t wear Dior, possibly due to Dior quickly denying her as an ambassador.
This led to speculations about her intentions to establish a relationship with a different brand.
Interestingly, during her stroll, an observant eye caught a mysterious circular patch on Meghan’s wrist when she raised her arm.
According to the fashion blog WhatMeghanWore, she was promoting an antenna energy device.
However, skepticism arose regarding the legitimacy of such devices, as they are often associated with scams.
While researching antennas for energy harvesting is a genuine field, questions were raised about the authenticity of small devices like the one Meghan was wearing.
WhatMeghanWore, the fashion blog run by Meghan Markle herself, has faced criticism for refusing to publish paparazzi photos on their page in support of her privacy, despite her alleged close relationship with the paparazzi.
This move has been deemed pretentious and laughable by some.
Furthermore, a native Californian pointed out that the heavy coat Meghan wore would only be necessary in San Francisco during the winter months.
In Southern California, where Meghan resides, most people don’t even own such heavy coats, opting instead for light jackets or sweatshirts when the coastal fog rolls in.
The observation was made that Harper Beckham, a child, was also seen carrying a Guyard bag recently, potentially overshadowing Harry’s wife, who reportedly has a long list of nemeses.
Critics argue that Meghan’s fashion choices do not align with the style of the ultra-wealthy.
They find it peculiar that she attempts to belong to a group that has already embraced designers like Guyard for years.
The branded belt and season-inappropriate attire are seen as desperate attempts to fit in.
Some even go as far as comparing her appearance to that of a little girl playing dress-up in her grandmother’s closet.
It is worth noting that Meghan’s choice of clothing has been criticized for being out of season and unavailable for purchase.
This further fuels the narrative that her fashion choices may be driven by desperation rather than genuine style.
As Chanel and Hermes contemplate taking legal action against Meghan, it remains to be seen how this situation will unfold.
The negative impact on these luxury brands’ reputations serves as a cautionary tale for the fashion industry, highlighting the potential risks associated with high-profile individuals and their fashion choices.