In a shocking turn of events, Omid Scobie, the author of Endgame, has been accused of not writing a single word in his book.

The revelation came as Rick Ebers, a prominent figure in the publishing industry, raised serious questions about the reliability and integrity of the book.

Scobie alleges that the book went through multiple revisions under the direct guidance of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, uncovering a web of deception and manipulation.

These revisions resulted in hundreds of changes, casting doubt on the credibility of the book.

A Dutch journalist, known for his exposés on the royal family, meticulously examined the profound changes made to the book.

Using Twitter as his platform, he highlighted the stark differences between the newly published version and the original version that had been removed from bookshelves in the Netherlands.

One of the most striking changes is the omission of certain names.

The revised version now includes the names of two family members who allegedly expressed concerns about the color of Prince Archie’s skin.

This omission raises questions about the book’s credibility and suggests a deliberate attempt to erase potentially embarrassing details.

Ebers also revealed that references to Scobie’s sources were systematically replaced with references to BBC News.

This calculated move raises doubts about the reliability of these sources and whether they were coerced into silence, further undermining the authenticity of the book.

But the revisions in Scobie’s book don’t stop there.

They also extend to issues related to people of color in the historical context discussed in the book.

It appears that the original content may have been deemed too explosive or inconvenient, prompting the author to tweak it to fit a more favorable narrative, possibly one that Meghan Markle would find suitable.

Ebers delved deeper into the textual changes and discovered revisions to titles in the book, including Queen Camilla’s transformation into Queen Camilla and Catherine’s change into Kate.

These changes highlight the extent to which the text was tailored to fit a particular agenda, revealing the heavy influence of the Sussex faction.

Furthermore, Ebers suggested that these textual changes bear the mark of the Sussex faction.

Insinuations have been made that sources close to Harry and Meghan provided different quotes for the revised versions, reinforcing suspicions that the couple sought to manipulate the story to their advantage.

The Dutch version of Endgame also faced its fair share of troubles during the simplification process, particularly concerning Prince Charles.

Scobie initially refused to name individuals in the book, but these revelations have exposed conflicts and the need for transparency.

In the midst of this controversy, photos of Scobie have emerged, showing him dressed casually, leaving the Chateau Marmont in West Hollywood in a hurry.

It remains unclear whether he was trying to avoid lingering questions about the book’s integrity.

Scobie attempted to shift blame onto the publisher, suggesting that they had worked on an early, unapproved version of his book.

However, the publisher quickly refuted these claims, asserting that Scobie’s account was inaccurate.

Adding to the growing concerns surrounding Scobie’s book, a source provided details via a blind column, shedding light on the challenges he faced in promoting his book despite employing various PR tactics.

The book failed to crack the top 10 in its first week of release, raising doubts about Scobie’s ability to repay the advance anytime soon.

Moreover, if Scobie has a royalty-sharing agreement with co-writer Meghan Markle, it could further complicate matters.

Speculation arises about Scobie’s future prospects, questioning whether there is a market for an author who has faced such controversy and poses a risk for future financial backers.

As the controversy surrounding Scobie’s book continues to unfold, the reliability and integrity of Endgame remain in question.

The revelations of manipulation and deception have cast doubt on the book’s credibility, leaving readers and industry insiders wondering about the true story behind its creation.