In a striking revelation, a former royal spokesperson has suggested that if Princess Diana were still alive today, she would have never permitted Prince Harry to marry Meghan Markle.
This bold claim has sparked a flurry of speculation about how different the royal landscape might be had the beloved “people’s princess” been around to influence her son’s romantic choices.
Dickie Arbiter, who served as a press spokesman for Queen Elizabeth II and has closely followed royal affairs, made this assertion during a recent chat on Times Radio.
He didn’t mince words, stating, “I’m going to stick my neck out here, and I doubt Harry would have married Meghan.”
His comments are steeped in the belief that Diana would have played a significant role in guiding her sons’ relationships, particularly when it came to Harry’s choice of partner.
Arbiter emphasized Diana’s protective nature as a mother, highlighting her fierce dedication to her sons, William and Harry.
He speculated that had she been alive, Diana would have likely raised concerns about Harry’s whirlwind romance with Meghan, questioning whether she was truly the right fit for the royal family.
Harry’s past relationships often ended due to the relentless media scrutiny that accompanies royal life.
Arbiter noted that many of the women Harry dated chose to step back from the spotlight, unwilling to endure the pressures of being in the public eye.
This context adds weight to Arbiter’s theory that Diana would have carefully evaluated Meghan’s suitability for her son.
The thought of Diana’s potential intervention has left royal watchers and historians pondering the many “what ifs.” Would she have used her influence to steer Harry away from Meghan, or would she have welcomed the American actress with open arms?
The possibilities are tantalizing, and opinions vary widely.
Since joining the royal family, Meghan Markle has faced relentless criticism and scrutiny, and Arbiter’s comments only add to the ongoing narrative surrounding her relationship with the rest of the royals.
While Meghan has yet to respond to these claims, the speculation they generate could further complicate her already tumultuous standing within the family.
Some experts believe that Diana’s presence could have acted as a vital buffer for Meghan, offering her the guidance and support necessary to navigate the complexities of royal life.
Conversely, others speculate that Diana’s strong-willed character might have clashed with Meghan’s, possibly leading to a confrontation that could have derailed the marriage.
Regardless of how one interprets these hypothetical scenarios, Arbiter’s remarks have reignited conversations about Princess Diana’s enduring legacy.
Even years after her tragic passing, her influence remains palpable within the royal family, shaping narratives and sparking discussions about what could have been.
As the world reflects on the 27th anniversary of Diana’s death, this latest revelation serves as a poignant reminder of the significant impact she had on her sons and the royal institution as a whole.
The absence of her maternal guidance is felt keenly, and the questions surrounding her potential involvement in Harry and Meghan’s relationship linger on.
What do you think about this intriguing speculation?
How do you feel Diana’s presence might have altered the course of events?