Scooby-Doo, the author of the controversial book “Finding Freedom,” is set to release another book titled “Endgame.”

This news has left people wondering if history will repeat itself, as it was later revealed that Harry and Meghan Markle had indeed provided information for Scooby-Doo’s previous publication.

The upcoming book, “Endgame,” promises to be filled with more explosive claims that may not bode well for the royals.

According to The Daily Mail, Scooby-Doo, whose real name is Omid Scobie, unveiled the cover of his latest book on Amazon, describing it as a penetrating investigation into the current state of the British monarchy.

The blurb hints at an unpopular king, a power-hungry heir to the throne, a queen willing to go to extreme lengths to protect her image, and a prince forced to start a new life after being betrayed by his own family.

However, upon closer inspection, it becomes evident that these descriptions seem to reflect Meghan Markle’s own experiences rather than an objective analysis of the royal family.

The notion of a prince starting a new life after being betrayed by his own family appears to be a projection of Meghan’s own actions, rather than an accurate portrayal of reality.

Furthermore, the claim of an unpopular king seems ironic, as it was Harry and Meghan who were fixated on popularity, while the rest of the royal family did not prioritize it as much.

While the royal family acknowledges the importance of serving the citizens and maintaining their happiness, they are not as consumed by popularity as Harry and Meghan.

A source quoted by The Mail on Sunday suggests that the upcoming book will contain serious allegations, potentially even charges of racism.

Given Meghan and Harry’s previous track record of making unfounded accusations, it is likely that this trend will continue in Scooby-Doo’s book.

The content may be entirely fabricated, but that won’t deter Scooby-Doo from writing whatever Meghan tells him to.

One of the anticipated bombshells in “Endgame” is the revelation of the mysterious member of the royal family who allegedly questioned the skin color of Archie, Meghan and Harry’s unborn child.

It is important to note that pondering what a baby might look like is not inherently racist, especially when the parents have distinct physical features.

In the past, Meghan and Harry denied any involvement with Scooby-Doo’s previous book, “Finding Freedom.”

However, it was later proven in court that Meghan did have a hand in its creation and was required to issue an official apology.

Whether they will distance themselves from Scooby-Doo ahead of this release or admit their involvement remains to be seen.

According to The Daily Mail, “Endgame,” scheduled for release on November 28th, is expected to cause further turmoil within Buckingham Palace.

It is unknown if the Sussexes had any input in this book, although Scooby-Doo claims to have interviewed family members.

However, it is likely that these family members are none other than Meghan and Harry themselves, as Scooby-Doo lacks the credibility of a genuine royal reporter.

The publisher, Harper Collins, has stated that the book will ignite global discussion, with Scooby-Doo promising to reveal moments that should shame the royals.

In his previous book, he delved into intimate details of Harry and Meghan’s first night together and conversations between the couple and senior royals.

These conversations were undoubtedly fed to him by Meghan and Harry themselves, possibly even recorded without consent.

Ironically, Scooby-Doo criticizes the royal family for actions that he himself should be ashamed of.

His unethical methods of obtaining information, such as recording private conversations, raise questions about his integrity and credibility.

It is becoming increasingly difficult to view Scooby-Doo as an unbiased and knowledgeable royal reporter.

Recently, Scooby-Doo took to Twitter to criticize the king and queen for walking on a red carpet laid out over bare ground during their state visit to Kenya.

However, his comments were deemed unfair by Kenyan journalists, who explained that this treatment is customary for all visiting heads of state.

Scooby-Doo’s habit of sharing opinions on matters he knows little about undermines his credibility and legitimacy.

In response to a fan’s comment about “Endgame” going deeper than “Finding Freedom,” Scooby-Doo vaguely replied, “they’re worlds apart.”

This cryptic response leaves readers questioning how “Endgame” will differ from its predecessor when the subject matter remains the same.

As the release date approaches, it is expected that media coverage surrounding the book will intensify.

However, it remains to be seen if the public will show genuine interest in a publication filled with falsehoods.

While Meghan and Harry’s devoted followers and those driven by morbid curiosity may purchase the book, fans of the British royal family are unlikely to support such a work of fiction.

In conclusion, Scooby-Doo’s upcoming book, “Endgame,” promises more controversy and explosive claims.

However, given the author’s biased approach and reliance on Meghan and Harry for information, its credibility is questionable.

The public’s interest in this book may be limited, as discerning readers seek factual and reliable accounts rather than sensationalized narratives.