The British monarchy is undergoing significant changes, and it seems that not everyone is pleased with the new direction.
Journalist and presenter Ofwa Hagen has expressed her concerns about King Charles’ decision to slim down the monarchy.
In a recent episode of Royally Obsessed, Hagen warned that this approach could have serious consequences.
Describing the current state of affairs, Hagen referred to the slimmed-down monarchy as a “skeleton staff.”
She pointed out that three of the top four executives are currently unavailable, leaving Queen Camilla to shoulder much of the burden.
While Camilla has been praised for her efforts, Hagen believes that one person alone cannot handle the responsibilities.
Hagen also raised concerns about the future of the monarchy.
She highlighted the fact that the most senior royals, aside from Kate and William, are relatively older.
If these individuals were to be removed from the equation, the monarchy would be left with a predominantly elderly group representing them on engagements.
Hagen argued that this does not align with the goal of creating a modern and streamlined monarchy.
To address this issue, Hagen suggested promoting Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.
However, it appears that the princesses have shown no interest in taking on such roles.
This reluctance poses a challenge to the idea of having understudies, as Hagen proposed.
Interestingly, Hagen’s suggestion brings to mind an exchange between Simon Farnaby, co-writer of Paddington 2, and Queen Elizabeth II.
Farnaby once complimented the Queen on her acting skills, to which she responded by stating that she is the Queen, not an actor.
This anecdote serves as a reminder that having an understudy for King Charles may not be a feasible solution.
King Charles’ decision to pursue a slimmed-down monarchy is undoubtedly a bold move.
However, as Hagen has warned, it is crucial for the King to proceed with caution.
The absence of key executives and the reliance on a few senior members may not be sustainable in the long run.
It remains to be seen how King Charles will address these concerns and ensure the monarchy’s success in the future.
In conclusion, the slimmed-down monarchy has garnered attention and criticism from journalist Ofwa Hagen.
She cautions King Charles to be mindful of the potential consequences of this approach.
With the absence of key executives and the predominance of older members, Hagen questions whether this strategy aligns with the goal of creating a modern monarchy.
The promotion of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie or the implementation of understudies may offer potential solutions, but their feasibility remains uncertain.
As the monarchy undergoes significant changes, King Charles must carefully navigate these challenges to ensure its continued relevance and success.