Montecito County has taken a firm stand against the jet travel of the Sussexes, led by Nesbitt, due to obligations towards residents.
The County Board of Supervisors made a decisive 3-2 vote denying Nesbitt a permit to use his helicopter for take-offs and landings at his $65 million property twice a week.
While Supervisors Peter Adam and Steve Lavagino supported granting the permit, the majority ruled against it.
The recent hearing on September 25th was marked by a surge of irate neighbors expressing their discontent.
During the Board of Supervisors hearing, Nesbitt addressed the issue, stating that despite complaints about helicopters flying from his property, none have done so in the past three and a half years except for emergencies and a noise demonstration.
He highlighted the unfair scrutiny he faces compared to other neighbors who allow unpermitted landings.
Nesbitt emphasized that the concern should not be solely on helicopters flying over Santa Barbara County.
The Santa Barbara Airport Authority revealed that there are over 700 helicopters and jets traversing the Southern County airspace each month.
Residents like Ronnie Mellon, a Montecito local for over four decades, voiced concerns about the disruptive noise and associated risks posed by low-flying jets.
The detrimental impact on peace, quiet, and the environment was a focal point of the opposition to Nesbitt’s permit.
Various neighborhood organizations and homeowner associations, including the Padaro Lane Association and the Montecito Association, joined residents in denouncing the permit at the supervisor’s hearing.
The sentiment against the Sussexes was further accentuated in a recent poll where Meghan and Harry were identified as the most bothersome couple in Montecito.
This backlash may result in a temporary suspension of their jet and helicopter usage until a resolution is reached.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced criticism for their environmental stance after being spotted taking numerous private jet trips despite advocating for climate action.
The couple’s recent appearance at an event in New York followed by a private jet journey back to their California residence fueled accusations of hypocrisy.
Former government minister Norman Baker condemned their actions, citing the excessive carbon emissions associated with private jet travel.
The discrepancy between the couple’s rhetoric on climate change and their actual practices has sparked outrage among critics.
Their lavish lifestyle, including frequent private jet usage, contradicts their public messages about environmental responsibility.
The stark contrast between their words and actions has drawn sharp rebuke from commentators and environmental advocates alike.
The ongoing scrutiny surrounding their behavior raises questions about the authenticity of their commitment to sustainable living.
In light of the mounting pressure and public backlash, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may need to reassess their approach to environmental advocacy.
The juxtaposition of their privileged lifestyle with their environmental activism has cast a shadow over their credibility.
As they navigate the fallout from this controversy, the Sussexes face a critical juncture in reconciling their public image with their personal choices.
The scrutiny surrounding their conduct serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of inconsistency in advocating for social causes.