The sudden closure of Dr. Melissa Drake’s practice, who allegedly delivered Meghan and Harry’s daughter Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, has raised eyebrows and sparked speculation.
The news broke after it was reported by the Daily Mail, leaving many wondering about the reasons behind this decision.
According to an Instagram post, Dr. Drake cited health concerns and a desire to spend more time with her family as the primary factors for her departure.
However, some of her patients have expressed dissatisfaction with the short notice given.
One aspect that has caught people’s attention is the lack of prior knowledge about Meghan’s obstetrician.
The Duchess of Sussex has always been protective of her children’s privacy, emphasizing that they are not public property.
This revelation has led to questions about how the information regarding Dr. Drake’s involvement in Lilibet’s birth became known.
Did Meghan or someone close to her leak the details?
Adding to the intrigue, the book “Finding Freedom” by Ahmed Scobay and Carolynda Rand mentioned a UK doctor overseeing the birth of Archie.
However, the doctor’s husband allegedly denied his wife’s involvement, stating that she was not working on that particular day.
Could there be hidden secrets surrounding Lilibet’s birth that Dr. Drake wishes to keep under wraps?
Furthermore, the timing of this news raises suspicions.
Why has it surfaced now when Dr. Drake’s identity was not publicly known during Lilibet’s birth?
Is it possible that concerns about potentially fraudulent birth certificates have prompted these questions?
Foreign titles are not typically allowed on US birth certificates, raising doubts about the accuracy of Lilibet’s official documentation.
Comparisons have been drawn to Grimes and Elon Musk’s situation, where they had to modify their son’s name on his birth certificate due to the use of foreign characters.
Curiously, Dr. Drake was not called out when the alleged fake birth certificate was released.
Additionally, it has been revealed that the photo accompanying the certificate is not of Lilibet but of 14-month-old Rebecca Kord, the granddaughter of a gardener.
The picture was taken in the US, not at Frogmore.
Meghan can claim deniability in this matter, as nowhere does she state that the child in the photo is hers.
The origin of this story can be traced back to a tweet by Omid Scobie, which mentioned Lilibet’s first birthday without explicitly stating the child’s identity.
However, the media seized upon the tweet and ran with the narrative, further fueling speculation.
It seems that Megzy, as Meghan is sometimes referred to, may find amusement in the gullibility of the public, as her actions continue to generate clickbait headlines.
It is worth noting that there is a growing community of YouTubers discussing the actions and behaviors of Harry and Meghan.
While some media outlets profit from the attention they attract, the couple’s actions have also raised concerns about their intentions and priorities.
The secrecy and discrepancies surrounding their decisions have left many skeptical and finding it difficult to believe that they genuinely care about anyone other than themselves.
Despite their efforts to control their narrative, the truth has a way of surfacing.
Real evidence is emerging from individuals who have had personal experiences with the couple, making it increasingly clear that their intentions may not align with their public image.
It is disheartening to witness their descent into self-pity and to see them deviate from the humanitarian work that was once expected of them.
In the end, Harry and Meghan will never be able to fill the void left by Princess Diana.