In a shocking turn of events, a well-known obstetrician from the UK has cast serious doubts on Meghan Markle’s claims of pregnancy.
Dr. Amanda Richards, who boasts over 25 years of experience in her field, points to recent revelations from Meghan and Prince Harry’s Netflix documentary as a major source of concern.
Let’s unpack this intriguing situation.
Earlier this year, a group of keen-eyed bloggers and fans began noticing peculiarities in photographs featuring Meghan during her supposed pregnancies with Archie and Lilibet.
Observers reported oddities such as the absence of a visible baby bump in certain outfits, inconsistencies in her proportions, and a lack of movement typically associated with a pregnant woman.
This led to rampant speculation about the possibility of Meghan using a “moon bump”—a prosthetic device often employed in the entertainment industry to create the illusion of pregnancy without an actual baby.
The theory that emerged suggested that Meghan might not have carried her children herself, perhaps to sidestep complications that could interfere with her public role and image.
While some dismissed these claims as ludicrous, lingering questions remained unanswered until now.
Dr. Richards has meticulously reviewed the available evidence and is expressing profound skepticism about Meghan’s pregnancies.
She spotlighted a particular scene from the Netflix documentary where Meghan steps out of a car wearing a tight-fitting green dress.
According to Dr. Richards, this moment serves as a critical piece of evidence that raises questions about the authenticity of Meghan’s claims.
The obstetrician observed that Meghan’s midsection appeared strikingly flat, especially considering she had given birth to Lilibet just seven months earlier.
Dr. Richards emphasized that it would be nearly impossible for any woman to achieve such a toned abdomen postpartum without surgical assistance, despite having access to personal trainers and nutritionists.
The body naturally takes time to recover after childbirth, making Meghan’s appearance all the more puzzling.
Additionally, Dr. Richards noted that Meghan’s gait seemed completely normal, lacking the characteristic waddle that often accompanies late-stage pregnancy.
In various clips where Harry embraces Meghan from behind, there were no visible signs of prosthetics, which one would expect if she were indeed using a moon bump.
Based on her professional assessment, Dr. Richards firmly believes that the cumulative evidence suggests Meghan may have utilized surrogates for both of her births, while employing Hollywood-style tactics to maintain a façade for public consumption.
Her medical background lends significant weight to her assertions, making them hard to ignore.
While some may find these claims difficult to accept, one must consider the lengths to which high-profile individuals go to maintain their images.
After all, when millions are at stake, is it really beyond the realm of possibility?
Meghan’s unique status as the first American, mixed-race royal bride has undoubtedly kept her in the spotlight, and her pregnancies played a pivotal role in shaping her public persona.
In light of various scandals, being pregnant offered Meghan a convenient excuse to step back from certain royal duties, including during the infamous Oprah interview.
Experts suggest that discreetly using surrogates might have allowed her to control public perception while mitigating risks to her career.
Even some of Meghan’s ardent supporters have pointed out the inconsistent appearances of her baby bump and her reluctance to discuss childbirth openly.
This has only fueled ongoing skepticism about the authenticity of her experiences.
If these speculations hold any truth, the fallout could be monumental.
A deliberate deception on such a grand scale would severely tarnish Meghan and Harry’s claims of authenticity and trustworthiness.
It could also shed light on longstanding rumors of tension within the royal family, who may have feared becoming unwitting accomplices should the truth come to light.
Perhaps the most concerning aspect is the potential impact on Archie and Lilibet, who could grow up without knowing the true circumstances surrounding their origins.
Despite previously denying allegations regarding their pregnancies, the Sussexes have chosen not to comment on Dr. Richards’ analysis when approached by major media outlets.
As this story continues to unfold, the question remains: Will royal experts or medical professionals rally behind or challenge Dr. Richards’ claims?
And will Meghan feel compelled to address these mounting concerns?
Only time will tell.