In the world of celebrity news, it’s not uncommon for photos to be manipulated or misrepresented.

And it seems that the recent pictures of Harry and Meghan may fall into that category.

In a video by Jesús Enrique Rosas, also known as the Royal Rogue, he raises some interesting points about the authenticity of these images.

The first thing that caught his attention was the headline from the Daily Fail, which stated that Harry and Meghan were holding hands.

However, upon closer inspection, none of the pictures actually show them holding hands.

This discrepancy raises suspicions about the accuracy of the reporting and the intention behind it.

Rosas then goes on to analyze the two pictures of Harry and Meghan individually.

He notes that in both pictures, their bodies are visible, but there is no physical contact between them.

This is unusual, considering they are a couple and would naturally have some form of physical interaction.

Rosas suggests that either there were two photographers capturing the images from different angles, or one photographer had the freedom to move around them.

In either case, it seems unlikely that they wouldn’t capture a clear shot of them holding hands.

To further support his argument, Rosas examines all the pictures released by Backgrid, the agency responsible for the images.

He points out that in every single picture featuring both Harry and Meghan, there is no physical contact between them.

This pattern raises doubts about the authenticity of the claims made in the headlines.

Rosas introduces a mind tool that he uses when analyzing body language in photos.

Instead of focusing on the people themselves, he suggests looking at the shapes and colors in the image.

By doing this, it becomes apparent that there is no integration between Harry and Meghan in any of the published pictures.

No touch, no overlapping, nothing that would indicate a close connection between them.

The Royal Rogue questions whether the photographers couldn’t find the right angle or if they were even in the same place.

He also mentions that the only picture that could potentially show them holding hands conveniently has Harry covered by a bodyguard.

This raises suspicions about the intentions behind the chosen images.

Adding to the intrigue, Rosas reveals that the photographer responsible for these images, Carl Larsson, has a clear bias towards Meghan.

He previously attempted to portray Thomas Markle in a negative light on his own YouTube channel.

This raises questions about the objectivity of the photographer and the motives behind these photos.

Rosas also points out some anomalies in the images themselves.

In one picture, the top of Meghan’s hat has a dark outline, which could indicate that she was cut out from a darker background and pasted into a lighter one.

Additionally, there are several pictures where Harry is conveniently hidden behind the SUV, and the lighting seems inconsistent.

The Royal Rogue concludes his analysis by reminding viewers that it’s easy to create realistic-looking images with the help of Photoshop.

He emphasizes the importance of questioning the authenticity of such photos and urges his audience to share their thoughts in the comments.

While it’s impossible to say for certain whether these photos were manipulated, Jesús Enrique Rosas raises valid concerns about their authenticity.

As consumers of news and media, it’s essential to approach such images with a critical eye and consider the motivations behind their creation.