When news broke that two top executives of Invictus Canada 2025 had been abruptly fired last week, rumors of the event being over budget had already been circulating.
Initially, many believed that their dismissal was due to financial mismanagement.
However, just five days after the firings, a full-blown public relations campaign, seemingly orchestrated by the Harkles, emerged in Vancouver.
This timing raises eyebrows and leads to speculation about the true reasons behind the staff changes.
It is reasonable to assume that it would have been wiser for Invictus to make these changes after the visit, in the best interests of the organization.
Unless, of course, these executives were hindering the visit due to financial concerns.
The coincidence of the firings with the onset of this extensive PR campaign seems rather peculiar.
It suggests that the visit may not have proceeded if the CEO and CQO had not been ousted, as Prince Harry had planned engagements beyond those related to Invictus.
As the patron, he had to ensure the trip moved forward, with Invictus covering the expenses.
In other news, the Vancouver Canucks and Canucks Autism Network will be hosting their fifth annual Autism Acceptance Night at Rogers Arena on November 20, 2023, during the Canucks vs. San Jose Sharks game.
This event aims to celebrate inclusion and acceptance, featuring voices from the autism community.
Cucksport and Entertainment, proud supporters of this cause, emphasize its importance within their community.
However, amidst the media’s focus on Harry and Meghan, the original purpose of the Canucks game, which was to promote autism acceptance, seemed to have been overshadowed.
This is indeed lamentable, as it raises questions about whether Harry hijacked the puck-drop moment from an autistic child.
Originally, an autistic child was supposed to represent their group in performing the ceremony.
Yet, Harry and Meghan seemed to have taken center stage instead.
Allegedly, Harry was asked to drop the puck due to his association with the event over time.
Nevertheless, there were alternative ways for him to participate while still highlighting the child’s role.
He could have appeared on the ice alongside the child, showing support and enthusiasm.
He could have handed the child the puck and cheered them on during the ceremony.
This approach would have created a more positive impact and presented better optics.
Unfortunately, Harry did not follow this path.
The Harkles overshadowed what was meant to be a night celebrating autism acceptance and the announcement of a $2.2 million donation for children’s autism programs.
Despite their appearance at the event, reports suggest that Harry and Meghan did not contribute financially to these programs.
Furthermore, it was Autism Awareness Day, and an autistic singer performed the national anthem.
While everyone faced forward to show respect, Meghan seemed fixated on Harry, repeatedly twisting her head to smile at him, despite his apparent disregard.
These incidents raise questions about why serious philanthropists, such as Michelle Amal, are reluctant to be associated with Invictus.
The organization seems to be more known for superficialities like skinny legs and wrinkled shorts, rather than inspiring athletic achievements.
This perception may hinder their ability to attract genuine philanthropic support from individuals who prioritize meaningful impact over celebrity status.