In recent times, Prince Harry has been facing criticism for allegedly overstepping his role and capitalizing on his affiliation with the Royal family.

Royal analyst Kinsey Schofield, the host of To Die For Daily, has voiced her concerns about Harry and Meghan’s lack of credibility in engaging in certain discussions without relying on their Royal titles.

When questioned about this phenomenon, Schofield explained that she understands why they do it, as neither of them has the credibility to weigh in on the spaces they want without their titles.

She specifically pointed out Prince Harry’s comment on the United States First Amendment as “bonkers” and his collaboration with the Aspen Institute as examples.

Schofield further emphasized that not only is Prince Harry underqualified, but he is also not a citizen of the US.

Despite this, he has managed to insert himself into these conversations by leveraging his Royal title.

While Schofield approves of the couple using their titles for charitable causes, she questions their involvement in cultural and political matters.

According to Schofield, she would not have a problem with Harry and Meghan using their titles to support charities and improve communication.

However, she raises concerns about Harry’s desire to change the cultural and political landscape through his Royal titles, which she believes raises trust issues.

The debate surrounding Harry and Meghan’s use of their Royal titles arises as they seek a new way of life in the US.

Since relocating in 2020, their engagement in discussions critiquing aspects of the American way of life has raised eyebrows.

Schofield expressed concern, stating that they want America to be their home, but the country fought a war to terminate the Royal family’s influence.

The question now is, what do you think about Prince Harry and Meghan using their Royal titles to influence political discussions in the US?

Share your thoughts in the comments section.

Stay tuned for more Royal news.