Last week, the sudden firing of two top executives at Invictus Canada 2025 raised eyebrows and sparked rumors of budget mismanagement.
Many believed that these individuals had been scapegoated for the event’s alleged financial woes.
However, what followed only added to the confusion as a full-blown public relations campaign, dubbed the “harkle PR campaign,” emerged in Vancouver just five days after the firings.
This timing raises questions about the true motives behind the terminations.
It seems peculiar that the firings coincided with the launch of an extensive PR campaign.
One can’t help but wonder if the decision to let go of these executives was influenced by their potential interference with planned engagements outside of the Invictus event.
After all, it is essential for Invictus to ensure a successful visit, especially considering Prince Harry’s role as the patron.
The trip had to proceed, no matter the cost, and Invictus ultimately footed the bill.
In other news, the Vancouver Canucks and Cook’s Autism Network proudly announced their collaboration for the fifth annual Autism Acceptance Night at Rogers Arena on November 20, 2023.
This event aims to celebrate inclusion and acceptance while amplifying voices from the autism community.
Michael Doyle, president of Cook’s Sport and Entertainment Business Operations, expressed their organization’s commitment to supporting causes close to their hearts.
The original intention of the Kinect game, a program focusing on autism acceptance, was unfortunately overshadowed by media attention centered around Prince Harry and Meghan.
This diversion from the cause raises the question: Did Harry steal the puck drop moment from an autistic child?
Initially, an autistic child was meant to perform the ceremony, representing their group.
However, Harry and Meghan seemingly took over this significant moment.
While Harry’s longstanding presence at such events may have played a role in his selection, there were alternative approaches that could have been taken.
Harry could have appeared on the ice alongside the child, acting as an enthusiastic and supportive figure.
He could have handed the child the puck, cheering them on as they dropped it, and followed up with a hug or high-five, depending on the child’s comfort level.
Such actions would have made a more positive impact and improved the overall optics of the situation.
Regrettably, Harry’s actions overshadowed what should have been a night dedicated to celebrating autism acceptance and the generous donation of $2.2 million towards children’s autism programs.
Despite their presence, Harry and Meghan reportedly did not contribute any funds to these programs.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that the event coincided with Autism Awareness Day, during which an autistic singer performed the national anthem.
While everyone else respectfully faced forward, Meghan’s constant head-turning and smiling at Harry drew attention away from the solemnity of the occasion.
These incidents have further fueled concerns among serious philanthropists, such as Michelle Amal, who prefer to distance themselves from Invictus.
The organization’s reputation seems to revolve more around superficial matters, such as Harry’s appearance and attire, rather than the inspiring athletic feats it aims to promote.