Prince Harry finds himself in hot water as Judge David Sherborn uncovers a questionable tactic in the ongoing phone hacking scandal.

Being labeled a liar by a judge is not something anyone wants to experience.

The Prince’s lawyer seems to be attempting to confuse matters as much as possible, selectively choosing which claims to address and which ones to dismiss.

It has been revealed that Prince Harry was aware of the case, contrary to any secret plot theories.

Instead, there was a settlement that was not made public, which is a common occurrence.

The notion that there is nothing unusual here is being emphasized.

However, it appears that the Prince’s goose may already be cooked, as the judge presiding over the Sun case has called him out.

While I am not a lawyer, I would invite legal professionals to analyze this recent development.

The judge highlighted a concerning factual inconsistency in the current pleaded cases.

It is alleged that Prince Harry did not have knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing before 2019.

However, his proposed amendment suggests that he would have brought the claim in 2012 if not for the secret agreement.

Prince Harry’s barrister, David Sherborn, argued that the claim in 2012 would have been fundamentally different.

He mentioned the existence of a draft amended particulars of claim that included the alleged secret deal.

The judge, however, clarified that he was referring to the inconsistencies in the case as it was initially presented.

Sherborn further explained that Prince Harry was unaware of the deal until 2012, as he had agreed not to pursue the publisher until other legal action related to phone hacking had concluded.

It is important to note that this is not a criticism of the late Queen or the royal family; rather, it is an acknowledgment of the procedures in place at the time, which Prince Harry accepted.

The Prince has claimed that the agreement was aimed at preventing a repeat of the reputational damage caused by the publication of an intimate conversation between his father, then Prince of Wales, and Camilla Parker Bowles in 1993.

He asserts that his grandmother granted him permission to pursue the case in 2017, following his engagement to Meghan that November.

This lawsuit is shedding light on the extent of Prince Harry’s psychological struggles.

His delusions, bitterness, and pathos are becoming increasingly apparent.

It is truly disheartening.

Attempting to mislead the court is a grave mistake, one that may have been tolerated in his Netflix show, book, and interviews, but not in a legal setting.

Prince Harry seems accustomed to complaining without regard for objectivity or facts, which only compounds the issue at hand.

The crux of the matter, as far as I understand it, revolves around whether the statute of limitations has expired based on Prince Harry’s knowledge of the wiretapping.

As a lawyer, without full knowledge of the case and having only read the provided information, it appears that the judge is questioning the Prince’s claim of innocence before 2019, while also relying on his alleged knowledge from 2012 to explain the late filing of the case.

Prince Harry’s lawyer, in response, seemingly points out the hypocrisy in the judge’s remarks.

However, this approach may not bode well for the Prince’s credibility, especially if it devolves into a he said, she said situation with the opposing side.

The judge’s stern gaze over his spectacles at the end of the exchange indicates that both parties are aware of the underlying implications.

It is a clear message: do not attempt to deceive.

Prince Harry has recently claimed that his father’s staff at Clarence House blocked his initial claim to maintain positive media relations and ensure a smooth transition for his stepmother and father to be accepted by the British public as queen consort and king, respectively.

While the outcome of this case remains uncertain, the judge’s highlighting of factual inconsistencies casts doubt on Prince Harry’s credibility.

It is clear that his lawyer understands the implications and the challenges they face.

The Prince’s credibility is at stake, and it remains to be seen how this will impact the final verdict or any potential damages awarded.