In a recent update on the ongoing Samantha Markle vs Meghan Markle case in Florida, it has been revealed that Meghan’s motion to appear on Zoom has been denied by the courts.

The next court date is scheduled for November 8th, or November 9th in Australia for those interested.

According to the Royal Grift, Meghan had hoped to have the argument conducted virtually to avoid the need for her lawyers to travel to Florida.

However, Judge Charlene Edwards-Honeywell firmly put her foot down and insisted that Meghan must physically show up in court.

One might wonder why Meghan was so insistent on having the court session on Zoom.

It seems that she wanted to maintain as much control over the narrative as possible.

Meghan is known to struggle with conversations that aren’t meticulously scripted, and it’s likely that neither she nor her lawyers would be comfortable answering spontaneous legal questions.

Her desire for control is evident in her recent Oprah interview, where she aimed to shape the narrative to her advantage.

However, it’s important to note that a court of law operates differently from an interview.

In this setting, the judge holds the ultimate authority.

It’s not surprising that Meghan may have believed she knew how to navigate a courtroom, considering her previous role as a lawyer on the television show “Suits.”

However, playing a lawyer on TV is vastly different from actually being one.

Additionally, given Meghan’s narcissistic tendencies, it wouldn’t be unexpected for her to instruct her lawyers to be ruthless towards other Markle family members by spreading lies about them.

Furthermore, Meghan’s reluctance to see her sister Samantha suggests that she fears the truth will come to light, something she experienced when Jason Narf released her and Prince Harry’s emails during her case against the Mail on Sunday regarding her father’s letter.

Meghan’s desire for a Zoom conference likely stems from her wish to have a recorded copy of the event, possibly for future use, such as with Netflix.

If Samantha’s goal is to increase Meghan’s legal expenses, then requiring all the lawyers to appear in person certainly achieves that.

The reality, however, is that this case holds little merit and is likely to be dismissed.

While it would be intriguing to witness Meghan defend her interview under oath, it seems unlikely to come to fruition.

After months of waiting, the court finally announced the date for the trial, marking Samantha’s third attempt to save her lawsuit.

If she is unsuccessful, it will be her last opportunity, as a judge previously informed her in March.

However, if Samantha succeeds, not only will she secure her trial, but Meghan will be required to undergo Discovery, a process in which she must hand over private texts, emails, and other relevant documents to her half-sister.

A trial date has been set for July 2024.

In the past, Meghan has been accused of providing Omid with information to tarnish Samantha’s reputation, secretly attempting to make people dislike her half-sister.

Despite denying any involvement with Omid’s book, Meghan’s actions suggest otherwise.

This raises concerns of defamation, as Meghan deliberately sought to portray Samantha in a negative light.

While Meghan’s lies were evident during the Oprah interview, she attempted to conceal her involvement with Omid’s book.

As the legal battle between Samantha Markle and Meghan Markle continues, it remains to be seen how the court proceedings will unfold.

With Meghan’s request for a Zoom appearance denied, she now faces the challenge of defending herself in person.

Only time will tell what revelations will emerge and how they will impact the outcome of the case.