In a significant move that has stirred conversations across the nation, King Charles has passed new legislation that effectively sidelines Prince Harry from the role of Councillor of State.

This bill introduces the Duke of Edinburgh and Princess Anne into the list of royal family members eligible to step in for the monarch, a decision many view as a strategic maneuver aimed at diminishing the Duke of Sussex’s influence.

The Councillor of State position is not just a ceremonial title; it carries substantial responsibilities.

Those appointed to this role can participate in Privy Council meetings, sign important documents, and receive the credentials of new ambassadors to the UK.

Traditionally, the role is filled by the monarch’s spouse and the first four individuals in the line of succession who are over 21 years old.

However, the recent amendments to the Regency Acts of 1937-1953 bring a new condition into play: only working members of the Royal Family will be eligible to act as Councillors of State.

This change effectively excludes Prince Harry, who stepped back from his royal duties in 2020, despite still being a senior royal by birthright.

The implications of this decision have sparked a range of responses.

Supporters argue that it is a necessary step to ensure the monarchy operates smoothly, while critics see it as yet another instance of Prince Harry being pushed to the margins.

Royal commentator Emily Ashton suggests this legislative move sends a clear message from the King, indicating he does not wish to delegate such a vital constitutional role to Prince Harry.

It symbolizes the ongoing rift between the brothers and highlights the King’s commitment to maintaining a stable and reliable team of working royals.

The exclusion of Harry from this key position is just the latest chapter in a narrative that has seen his standing within the Royal Family grow increasingly fragile.

His choice to step away from royal duties and relocate to the United States with his wife, Meghan Markle, has fueled ongoing tensions.

Their high-profile interviews and the release of Harry’s memoir have further strained connections with other family members.

Royal historian Dr. Sarah Gristwood notes that Harry’s departure from royal life has complicated his familial ties.

King Charles now faces the daunting task of ensuring the monarchy remains stable and continuous, and this recent bill appears to be a pragmatic approach to that challenge.

Conversely, some observers believe that excluding Prince Harry from the Councillor of State role represents a lost opportunity for reconciliation.

Royal commentator Penny Junor argues that this could have been an ideal moment for the King to extend an olive branch to his son, showing a willingness to mend fences.

Instead, it seems like another door has closed on Harry.

Furthermore, the discussions surrounding the Councillor of State bill have ignited broader questions about the roles of non-working royals within the monarchy.

With reports suggesting that King Charles intends to streamline the royal family, it remains uncertain whether other non-working royals, like Prince Andrew, will also find themselves sidelined from official responsibilities.

Dr. Gristwood emphasizes the delicate balancing act facing the monarchy today.

On one hand, there is a pressing need to maintain continuity and stability; on the other, the institution must evolve in response to the shifting social and political climate.

The decisions made regarding the Councillor of State role are merely the surface of a much larger, ongoing transformation within the royal institution.