King Charles III surprised many when he made an unexpected visit to the Royal Courts of Justice in London, just a day before the ruling on his son Prince Harry’s hacking claims against a tabloid newspaper publisher.

While the monarch appeared at the High Court to express gratitude towards the judiciary for upholding the system of justice in the country, sources suggest that there may be deeper implications behind his visit.

The timing of King Charles’ visit is particularly significant as it not only reinforces the relationship between the judiciary and the crown but also honors the tradition set by his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II.

Throughout her reign, Queen Elizabeth II frequently visited the Royal Courts of Justice, symbolizing the close connection between the monarchy and the legal system.

Charles, with a smile on his face and in high spirits, interacted with students who had just participated in a mock trial in one of the courtrooms.

He jokingly apologized for interrupting their session before engaging in conversations with the young people from Ashcroft Technology College.

Moving on from the students, the king proceeded to the painted room where he met voluntary magistrates who dedicate their time to support the justice system by hearing criminal and family cases across England and Wales.

The royal family’s official social media accounts shared a stunning photo of the monarch during his visit, captioning it as a celebration of the judiciary’s work and commitment to the rule of law.

During his visit, King Charles addressed the judges and magistrates, expressing his immense gratitude for their efforts in maintaining the system of justice in the country.

He acknowledged that many others around the world are envious of the British justice system and thanked them wholeheartedly.

The timing of his visit, however, coincided with a crucial moment for Prince Harry, as the outcome of his unlawful information gathering claim against Mirror Group Newspapers was due to be announced in the High Court.

While the royal family’s schedule is planned months in advance, some have speculated that Meghan’s supporters believe King Charles’ visit was a deliberate attempt to manipulate the outcome of Harry’s case, resulting in his loss.

These speculations suggest that Charles, who may be perceived as weak, delayed his visit until now due to alleged threats from Prince William, who supposedly threatened to leave with his wife Kate and their children if Harry were to win the case.

However, it is worth questioning whether such assumptions hold any truth.

If Charles truly intended to influence the outcome, would he really make a public appearance on the eve of the ruling?

It is important to note that the judgment in Harry’s court case was already made at least a week ago.

Both the claimants and defendants receive an embargoed written judgment a week prior to the oral judgment being delivered in court.

Therefore, the outcome of the case was already known to Harry and the Mirror Group since last week.

To provide some context, Prince Harry sued the publisher for damages, alleging that journalists from The Daily and Sunday Mirror and Sunday People were involved in phone hacking, deception to obtain information, and the use of private investigators for unlawful activities.

Critics have raised questions about the validity of Harry’s claims, particularly regarding alleged phone hacking during his time at Eton, despite him not having a mobile phone at the time.

Additionally, some argue that Harry’s reliance on lawsuits as a means of income raises concerns about the sustainability of such a strategy.

In conclusion, King Charles’ visit to the Royal Courts of Justice has sparked discussions and raised questions about its potential influence on Prince Harry’s case outcome.

While some speculate that the visit was orchestrated to manipulate the ruling, it is essential to consider the timing and the fact that the judgment had already been made.

The outcome of the case will undoubtedly have significant implications for both Prince Harry and the British justice system as a whole.