King Charles, the father of Prince Harry, offered a surprising response when questioned about his son’s potential return to England.
In 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made the decision to step back from their royal duties, subsequently relocating to the United States with their two children.
This move marked a significant shift in their relationship with the royal family, leading to ongoing speculations and reports.
Recent revelations from Mirror UK suggest that Prince Harry and King Charles are currently navigating a strained relationship with minimal communication between them.
Despite the reported tension, King Charles found himself faced with an unexpected inquiry regarding Prince Harry’s return during a visit to the Stratford University campus in East London, held in celebration of its 125th anniversary.
Amongst students and supporters, a man called out, urging the monarch to bring Harry back to England.
Initially taken aback, King Charles inquired, ”Who?”
The man clarified, ”Harry, your son.”
In response, King Charles hesitantly remarked, ”That’s wonderful,” indicating a mix of emotions surrounding the topic.
In a separate royal event, Prince Harry was present at his father’s coronation as King Charles at Westminster Abbey in June.
Alongside his extended family members, he participated in the ceremony before senior royals made their entrance.
Notably, Robert Jobson’s recent addition to British royal family literature, “King Charles III, Man and Monarch Revealed,” shed light on the deteriorating relations within the royal household.
The book alleges that Queen Elizabeth II and King Charles ceased returning Prince Harry’s calls as tensions escalated.
According to Jobson’s account, King Charles opted to cut off communication with Prince Harry after being subjected to verbal abuse during a heated discussion regarding financial matters.
The Duke of Sussex’s disrespectful behavior towards his father led to a breakdown in their relationship, with Prince Charles choosing to distance himself from further confrontations.
When questioned by the Queen about his decision to disengage, King Charles emphasized that he was not acting as a financial provider, as detailed in Jobson’s publication.