In the realm of royal commentary, few figures stir as much controversy as Lady Colin Campbell, affectionately known as Lady C. This Jamaican-British author and television personality has made headlines with her bold statements about the British royal family.

Her latest work, “Meghan and Harry: The Real Story,” promises to be no exception, as it reportedly unveils startling insights into the lives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Lady C claims to have conducted extensive interviews—over 120, to be precise—with individuals closely connected to Meghan and Harry.

Through these conversations, she aims to shed light on what really happened behind palace walls, particularly during Meghan’s pregnancy with their first child, Archie.

What she reveals is a stark contrast to the idyllic narrative that the couple has shared with the public.

Instead of the serene and joyful experience often depicted, Lady C alleges that Meghan’s pregnancy was fraught with tension.

According to her, friction simmered between Meghan and the royal aides, who were reportedly frustrated by what they perceived as her diva-like behavior.

Lady C suggests that Meghan’s reluctance to adhere to traditional royal protocols only exacerbated the situation, as she opted to hire personal public relations representatives instead of working through established royal channels.

The conflict reportedly reached a boiling point when Meghan decided that no senior royals would meet baby Archie until she deemed it appropriate.

This decision, according to Lady C, sent shockwaves through the palace and left officials feeling deeply unsettled.

Harry’s unwavering support for Meghan during this tumultuous time only intensified the frustration felt by the royal family.

As the narrative unfolds, Lady C paints a picture of chaos and dysfunction in those early days of Archie’s life.

Meghan’s tight grip on access and communication reportedly alienated other royal women, leaving them feeling unwelcome within their own family.

In a world where royals are accustomed to a certain decorum, this shift in dynamics raised eyebrows and sparked concerns among senior courtiers.

Perhaps one of the most explosive claims made by Lady C is that tensions escalated dramatically when Meghan restricted contact between Archie and his great-grandmother, the Queen.

This action, described as the final straw by insiders, fueled a growing desire among palace aides to find a way to resolve the situation, even if it meant pushing for Meghan’s exit from royal life.

Lady C also questions Meghan’s previously stated desire for privacy during her pregnancy, noting that no other royal wife, including the late Princess Diana, had sought such extreme isolation.

She suggests that Meghan’s approach may have been a calculated strategy from the outset, designed to challenge the traditional royal framework.

While there were reports of a brief easing of tensions after Meghan returned from maternity leave, Lady C argues that the damage had already been done.

The relationships within the family had been strained, setting the stage for the couple’s eventual departure from royal duties and the subsequent bombshell interviews that followed.

This narrative starkly contradicts the Sussexes’ portrayal of their time within the royal family as a distressing experience that took a toll on their mental health.

According to Lady C’s sources, Meghan allegedly leveraged her role as a mother to question and disrupt the established royal order, raising serious implications about her intentions.

Should any of Lady C’s allegations hold water, they could significantly reshape the public’s perception of Meghan—from an advocate for progressive change to someone who may have sought to manipulate her royal status for personal gain.

Given Lady C’s history of controversial opinions, it’s wise to approach her claims with a healthy dose of skepticism.

However, the sheer volume of sources she cites hints that there may be more than just speculation at play.

If Meghan chooses to respond to these incendiary claims, it promises to ignite a firestorm of media attention and public discourse.