Tomorrow marks a special day for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as their daughter, Lilibet, turns two years old.
Lilibet’s second birthday falls on June 4th, and although no formal plans have been announced, the Sussexes typically prefer to celebrate family birthdays in a private manner.
However, there has been a recent development as WME Agency, under Meghan’s orders, released an old photoshopped picture of Lilibet in a PR post to commemorate the occasion.
The question arises: where are the new, authentic photos of her?
It seems that the WME propaganda machine has started spinning.
Adding to the intrigue, there are claims that Lilibet has inherited her father’s red hair.
This insistence on Archie and Lilibet having red hair has become quite peculiar.
In fact, some have pointed out that even the Christmas and birthday cards are being tinted to make their hair appear redder.
It’s an odd obsession, similar to Prince Harry’s refusal to accept his baldness and his continuous attempts to cover it up.
Meghan, too, seems to be caught up in this struggle for acceptance, frequently visiting the plastic surgeon’s office.
It appears that they cannot fully embrace the unique children they have, as they do not possess the same “stardust” as Princess Diana.
They are not blonde and blue-eyed like their late grandmother.
Previously, Meghan faced accusations of photoshopping and dyeing her hair.
Today, a new picture of Harry and their two children surfaced on Twitter.
In the photo, the back of Lilibet’s head appears brown, while Archie’s face is blurred, and he sports bushy brown curly hair.
The combination of a brunette and a pale ginger parent usually does not result in two redheaded children.
It is more likely to produce brown hair, or perhaps a blondish shade.
The fact that both children have red hair seems suspicious, raising questions about the authenticity of their genetic traits.
Some even delve into the realm of faked pregnancies.
The attempt to capture the attention of American readers by explaining George V’s letters patent while sharing a rather unflattering photo of a ginger child seems futile.
It is unlikely that such a piece of puffery on an obscure website will attract much interest, especially considering the dubious tactics employed by WME.
As one Quora user named Jenny Dot astutely pointed out, it appears that WME is simply taking advantage of Prince Harry and Meghan’s fame to profit from such content.
Jenny Dot further speculated on the topic, suggesting that the surrogate initially carried twins.
Rumors circulated that the surrogate had an emergency C-section with one of the babies due to cord stress.
It was then suggested that the child who was supposed to be handed over to the couple did not survive, and legally, the surrogate was not obligated to give them the other child.
There may have been a legal loophole allowing the surrogate to keep the second twin, especially if she had already received initial health expenses.
This could have provided her with a significant sum of money, along with a non-disclosure agreement, preventing any potential lawsuit from Meghan.
The truth would have been exposed in court.