Prince Harry’s recent three-day visit to the UK has caused quite a stir, with reports suggesting that he stayed at Frogmore Cottage despite being evicted from the property.

However, it has now been revealed that these rumors are false, and Harry did not have access to the palace during his personal trips.

King Charles and Prince William also did not meet him during this time.

Upon his arrival in the UK, King Charles was still on his visit to Romania, while Prince William was occupied with a military event at Buckingham Palace.

This information aligns with a report on Twitter, which claimed that Harry left behind a hefty bill at Soho House, including unpaid bar and food expenses.

It seems that Harry may have been under the impression that his friend Marcus Anderson, a housemate at Soho, would forgive the debt.

Staff at Soho House initially shared Harry’s receipts on Twitter but later deleted them.

It appears that Harry spent his time at an empty and isolated Frogmore Cottage, located 40 minutes away from London, without any room service.

Despite arriving on Sunday night, he could have made a court appearance on Monday instead of attending his child’s birthday celebration, which turned out to be a false claim.

On Sunday night, Harry was reportedly partying at Soho House and was in no condition to appear in court the following day.

Although Harry was advised against going to court, his sense of entitlement and privileged upbringing, where he was rarely contradicted, gave him misplaced confidence.

His belief that he could outsmart Barrister Andrew Green was astounding.

However, arrogance seems to be a common trait among members of the royal family.

In 2019, Prince Andrew’s disastrous TV interview with Emily Maitlis highlighted his connections to convicted s** offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Despite witnessing this car crash of an interview, Harry still thought he could take on Andrew Green, a renowned and formidable cross-examiner known as “The Beast” among fellow barristers.

Green’s reputation precedes him, and his opponents fear his relentless questioning.

When it was announced that Green would represent the Mirror Group against Harry, fellow lawyers predicted that he would be well-prepared and far more formidable than Harry anticipated.

Instead of resorting to unpleasant tactics, Green plans to expose Harry as an unreliable historian whose arguments should not be trusted solely because of his high-profile status.

One barrister even suggested that Harry would consider Green friendly, not realizing the challenge that lies ahead.

During the court proceedings, the judge asked Harry if he had evidence of hacking, to which Harry replied that he was there to find out.

This response only highlights Harry’s lack of understanding, as he is the one who brought the case and bears the burden of proof.

The Mirror Group, on the other hand, has no obligation to prove anything.

In conclusion, Prince Harry’s recent visit to the UK has been marred by controversies and false rumors.

Despite claims of staying at Frogmore Cottage, it has been revealed that he had no access to the palace during his personal trips.

Additionally, reports of an unpaid bill at Soho House have further fueled the speculation surrounding Harry’s behavior.

As the court case unfolds, it remains to be seen how Harry will fare against the formidable Barrister Andrew Green, who is determined to expose him as an unreliable historian.