In a surprising turn of events, Megan has taken down a six-part Netflix documentary, feeling the pressure of an impending legal action from Samantha Markle’s lawsuit.

The Sussexes have removed their documentary from Archwell, where they had previously made fun of the Queen’s curtsy.

Strangely, even though they attempted to erase any traces, Archwell is still credited with the production, suggesting that they may not be as proud of their love story as they had portrayed.

The six-part documentary has disappeared from the Archwell Productions website, raising questions about their commitment to it.

Although it is still available on Spotify, the removal of the documentary from Archwell suggests a deliberate attempt to distance themselves from it.

Royal fans speculate that Megan’s decision to delete the documentary is connected to Samantha’s lawsuit.

Samantha’s lawyer argues in the defamation lawsuit that Megan and Harry, as producers, are responsible for every word in the documentary, thereby defaming Samantha.

This recent action seems to strengthen Samantha’s defamation claims as the Sussexes’ roles as producers are highlighted.

Despite their efforts to remove and hide content, the documentary remains on Netflix, leading to speculation about Megan’s motives behind her apparent panic.

Megan’s legal team is currently seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming it lacks merit.

Samantha Markle alleges in the lawsuit that Megan made false and reckless statements that damaged her reputation and disrupted her peaceful life in Lakeland.

She points to the Oprah Winfrey interview where Megan denied knowing her sister and the Netflix series where it was suggested that Samantha attacked Megan on Twitter.

Samantha denies being part of any attack campaign and hopes the lawsuit will expose Megan’s attempts to tarnish her reputation.

The defense argues that Samantha’s claims do not meet the level of defamation, asserting that Megan’s recollection of their childhood is a subjective matter.

The truth remains elusive amidst changing narratives and legal battles, and Megan’s attorneys argue that the case lacks a solid foundation.

According to News.com Australia, Megan may have to answer questions about the alleged royal racism.

These claims were made during her interview with Oprah and reiterated in Omid Scobie’s book, “Endgame,” where she accused her father-in-law, King Charles III, and her sister-in-law, Catherine, the Princess of Wales.

Samantha’s lawyer insists that this issue needs to be explored and could be part of Samantha’s lawsuit.

Samantha’s lawyer suggests that there are reasons why Megan distanced herself from her family and turned against them.

He states, “This is a person who wants to be able to say horrible things and not really care if she destroys the lives of people in her family.

She doesn’t care if she destroys the monarchy.”

If Samantha’s defamation case successfully exposes Megan, it will shed light on her deceitful nature, similar to the exposure from Jason Knopf during her court case over a letter.

Megan will experience the consequences of her own actions, as she frequently sues people for even the slightest offense she believes she has suffered.

Samantha is not suing Megan for money; she simply wants to expose her sister’s lies.

She is seeking only $75,000, which is not a significant amount.

This lawsuit may help restore some of Samantha’s reputation that has been tarnished by false tabloid stories.