In the world of podcasting, there have been some interesting revelations about Megan Markle.

According to a source shared by SecondhandCokeOnQuora, it seems that Megan has joined the solidarity movement with Iran by recording a podcast with Shoray Aghalashou.

However, it is not clear whether this episode is for Aghalashou’s podcast or a new episode of Malarkey Types.

Although this information has not been confirmed by the press yet, if true, it seems that Megan is once again jumping on bandwagons while remaining irrelevant.

The source also claims that Megan’s podcast, Nodcast, has a real listener count of approximately 1.5 million.

However, it is important to note that this number includes everyone who has played at least one episode, not necessarily regular listeners.

The accuracy of this information is still unconfirmed, but it is likely that this number represents the total times the podcast has been streamed rather than regular listenership.

Interestingly, the source’s contacts at Spotify allegedly revealed that even the staff at Spotify refuse to refer to Megan’s podcast as “archetypes.”

This is because Megan has not discussed a single archetype yet.

Instead, during internal meetings, the staff reportedly refers to the show as “stereotypes.”

This sheds light on the perception of Megan’s podcast within the industry.

In her most recent podcast episode, Megan faced criticism after she claimed that her reputation for being demanding was due to society’s “angry black woman” stereotype.

However, a commentator named Caleb Bond countered this claim in a column for Sky News Australia.

Bond argued that Megan’s supposed reputation has nothing to do with her ethnicity but rather her actions.

He stated that Megan’s perceived demand and difficulty are disliked by many people worldwide, not because of her skin color but because of her unpleasant behavior.

Bond further criticized Megan for shifting blame onto others and maintaining a self-delusion of perfection.

Royal author Alexandra Shellman also expressed her criticism of Megan’s behavior.

In a recent piece for the Daily Mail, Shellman described Megan as a “narcissistic marshmallow” with misguided observations.

While acknowledging that some people may be taken aback by a straightforward woman, Shellman emphasized the importance of behavior regardless of gender.

She pointed out that it is crucial to communicate clearly without undermining or intimidating others, treating them with respect and fairness.

Megan’s podcast has been described as a relentless California-style rant, filled with soft-voiced whining.

While she may intend to boost women’s self-image, it seems that her perspective comes across as narcissistic, offering poor advice and self-centered observations.

Shellman believes that Megan’s focus on her perceived disadvantages as a woman and mixed-race individual overshadows the need for genuine empathy and understanding.

It is clear that Megan Markle’s podcast and reputation have become subjects of controversy and critique.

While some argue that her demanding nature and behavior contribute to her negative image, others question the validity of her claims and the impact of her podcast.

As the discussions continue, it remains to be seen how Megan will navigate the complexities of her public persona and the reception of her podcast.