Megan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, made quite the statement at the San Jose Sharks vs Canucks game in Vancouver.
While her husband, Prince Harry, took center stage by dropping the puck to start the game, all eyes were on Megan and her stunning ensemble.
The duchess donned over £40,000 worth of jewelry, including a trio of Cartier accessories.
Her black sweater top and Altuzarra Surge black boot cut trousers, priced at £635, were perfectly complemented by her Cartier pieces.
Megan wore the Justin Clu small necklace in yellow gold and diamond, valued at £12,122, along with the iconic love yellow gold bracelet worth up to £5,026.
To complete her look, she sported the gold Tank Front Say Watch, retailing at around £24,900.
Adding a touch of elegance, Megan accessorized with a Lorraine Schwartz against Evil Eye 5-Eye Diamond Pave Bracelet, valued at £14,754.
In total, her outfit and accessories for the ice hockey game amounted to over £50,000.
However, recent revelations have shed light on the source of funds used for Megan’s lavish purchases.
A source from Entertainettes has decoded her Cartier jewelry purchase and its potential impact on the Archwell charity fund.
Speculation arises as to whether the money used for the watch, which resembles Princess Diana’s, came from the charity.
This raises further questions about other jewelry items owned by Megan, as previous reports indicated that 95% of the Archwell fund was used to cover expenses for the couple, with only 5% going to charity.
The exorbitant cost of the Cartier French Tank Watch has sparked debates about extravagance.
Beyond its performance, the watch’s value lies in its exquisite workmanship and rare materials, capturing the attention and curiosity of many.
Megan Markle’s influence extends beyond the realm of fashion; it shapes public discourse and directs attention towards societal issues.
The contrast between her extravagant purchase and ongoing charity initiatives has ignited a conversation about the responsibility of public figures in the realm of philanthropy.
Prince Harry and Megan Markle’s decision to step down as members of the royal family in 2020 has not been without challenges.
The couple’s ability to navigate their new life in the US has been a topic of discussion.
Kinsey Schofield, speaking on Talk TV, sarcastically remarked that the couple, who sought freedom by moving to LA, now find themselves seeking employment.
Schofield suggested that staying in the good graces of senior royal members would have made it easier for them to establish successful careers.
She also highlighted the perks enjoyed by Princess Catherine as a prestigious royal figure, with A-listers lining up to meet her while Megan struggles to gain recognition.
These comments were prompted by Megan’s recent appearance at Variety’s gala in LA, where she experienced an awkward interruption while posing for paparazzi on the red carpet.
The former Suits actress, once again, found herself patiently waiting to talk to the media, reinforcing the perception that she is just another celebrity seeking attention.
Megan Markle’s jewelry choices and their connection to the Archwell charity fund have sparked a debate about the responsibility of public figures in philanthropy.
While her fashion choices continue to captivate audiences, questions remain about the source of funds used for such extravagant purchases.
As the Duchess of Sussex continues to navigate her new role outside the royal family, the scrutiny surrounding her actions and choices only intensifies.