As the shocking split between Harry and Meghan and the House of Windsor is meticulously detailed in the book Royals at War, co-authored by Dylan Howard and Andy Tillett, new revelations have emerged about Meghan Markle’s spending habits and the misuse of royal funds.
Queen Elizabeth II had been closely monitoring Meghan’s expenditures, and the findings have raised eyebrows within royal circles.
According to the book, Meghan reportedly spent over half a million pounds on her public event wardrobe alone in 2018.
This extravagant spending extended to her private life as well, including jewelry, acquisitions, and the renovation of Frogmore Cottage.
Not only did Prince Harry contribute to Meghan’s expenses, but her mother, Doria Ragland, also provided financial support.
Private trips to the US and Canada accompanied by bodyguards were among the expenses covered by these allowances.
The stark contrast between Meghan’s spending and that of Princess Catherine, the future queen consort, has not gone unnoticed.
While Meghan indulged in opulent purchases, Princess Catherine reportedly spent a mere £80,000 during the same year.
This discrepancy among palace staff and insiders has caused concern.
Doria’s allowance, amounting to £10,000 per month, has also sparked public outrage.
It was drawn from the king’s personal finances, leading to speculation that Meghan relied on her mother’s financial support due to Doria’s past legal troubles and time spent in jail.
This financial backing allowed Meghan and Harry to sustain their lavish lifestyle and potentially perpetuate specific narratives.
The exact nature of this arrangement remains unclear, leaving uncertainty about whether King Charles was aware of these financial dynamics.
Unlike the Middleton family, who operated a party planning business, Doria did not have an independent source of income during this period.
This oversight resulted in financial strain for Meghan’s father, as the issue of repaying loans was neglected.
Doria’s consistent presence in Meghan and Harry’s life, coupled with her frequent requests for financial assistance, has led to her being perceived as a persistent presence, almost like a third wheel.
Interestingly, despite lacking significant prior experience, Doria assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer at a senior care agency.
This move raised eyebrows, given the prevalence of Medicare fraud within the industry and the agency’s limited digital footprint.
Before Meghan and Harry’s wedding, there were claims that Doria was unwelcome by the royal family.
However, royal commentator Lady C asserted that Doria did receive invitations to numerous events hosted by Prince William and Catherine.
Nevertheless, Doria often cancelled at the last minute or attended briefly.
Meghan’s constant presence alongside her mother during royal engagements has raised questions about her motivations for keeping Doria close.
It is speculated that Doria’s ability to maintain discretion, influenced by her personal history, may have played a role in Meghan’s decision making.
In an attempt to refurbish her public image, Meghan Markle is now facing accusations of enlisting the support of her mother, Doria Ragland.
The controversy arose after Doria’s notable presence alongside the Kardashians at a charity event.
This resurgence of Doria’s public presence suggests her pivotal role in Meghan’s pursuit of independence, separate from her royal titles.