Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s company, Archwell, has been facing significant delays in obtaining trademarks.

Now that the archetype trademark has been officially completed, questions arise about the fate of Archwell Audio.

If this trademark is also abandoned, it would leave only Archwell Productions and Archwell Original Not-For-Profit, supposedly dedicated to philanthropy.

However, it seems that Archwell Productions is struggling with staffing issues, as it appears to have only one member on board.

Additionally, Archwell is facing trouble with the trademark office, having reached the limit of five extensions for its application.

Allegedly, the fourth attempt was denied due to a lack of clarity regarding its purpose and product.

Interestingly, there are claims that Archwell is using Kevin Costner’s content as a distraction from its own struggles.

The company, along with Harry himself, has been linked to Balmoral and Invictus, further diverting attention from its problems.

Staff turnover at Archwell continues, suggesting a shrinking operation.

According to a source, French journalists recently visited Archwell’s empty office space in Beverly Hills, discovering a complete lack of activity.

Their visit was documented, highlighting the company’s lack of transparency.

It seems that Archwell has always revolved around Meghan, appearing to be her personal project used for money laundering purposes.

Oddly enough, Harry has not shown any significant financial involvement in Archwell, instead taking on positions at other organizations like BetterUp.

This raises questions about his commitment to Archwell and its success.

As for Archwell Productions, it was announced in April that WME would be responsible for making it operational, but little progress has been made.

Speculation suggests that Meghan and Harry may no longer be actively involved in Archwell Productions, and Archwell Audio may have ceased operations.

The remaining staff members are seemingly engaged in self-congratulatory activities and occasional guest speaking roles.

The recent focus on Kevin Costner appears to be a deliberate distraction from Archwell’s impending closure.

Despite signing Meghan in January and announcing her collaboration with WME in April, no contracts have been provided by the agency.

This raises concerns about the effectiveness of Archwell as a platform for Meghan’s endeavors.

Reports indicate that Meghan and Harry received a $10 million donation from a California foundation in 2022, along with other funds.

However, it remains unclear how this money has been utilized, as it has not been directed towards any charitable causes.

This raises suspicions of money laundering and self-serving behavior.

One may wonder why individuals choose to donate to Archwell instead of directly supporting the causes they wish to help.

The lack of transparency within the organization is alarming, and the diversion of funds towards Meghan’s attorney raises further questions about the true intentions of Archwell.

Recently, Archwell came under scrutiny when government investigations revealed that its office was completely empty, lacking computers or documents.

This raised doubts about the legitimacy of the company, suggesting it may be a sham.

Archwell’s alleged promotion of Meghan’s personal brand is not a new phenomenon.

While it is not uncommon for celebrities to raise awareness for causes, heavily promoting oneself while neglecting substantial work behind the scenes is questionable.

The lack of transparency only adds to the concerns surrounding Archwell.

In a previous exclusive report, The Sun revealed that Meghan and Harry’s Archwell trademark application for their non-profit venture was rejected.

The former royals did not sign the application, which was deemed too vague, and they failed to pay the necessary fees.

Interestingly, the application was filed by Cobblestone Lane LLC, registered in Delaware but linked to a Hollywood power lawyer who has been associated with Meghan for years.

As Archwell continues to face trademark delays and mounting controversies, it remains uncertain whether the company will be able to overcome these challenges.