A royal expert has suggested that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry consider adopting alternative titles to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Marlene Koenig, a renowned royal historian, proposed that the couple could be referred to as Plain Harry Sussex and Meghan Sussex.
The discussion around their titles comes in light of recent public scrutiny regarding their children, Archie and Lilibet, and their eligibility for royal designations.
Despite relinquishing their HRH titles upon stepping back from senior royal duties, Meghan and Harry continue to use the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles.
Meghan notably utilized the Duchess title, excluding HRH, in her children’s book, “The Bench.”
The ongoing debate questions the appropriateness of this choice, with Koenig suggesting a shift towards different monikers for the couple.
In a rare public appearance, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry were seen embarking on a brief outing this week.
Reports indicate that the couple made a five-minute journey to Oprah Winfrey’s expansive 7-acre estate, where they reportedly spent approximately an hour.
Speculation has arisen suggesting that this visit might precede another revealing interview, following the impactful televised discussion in 2021.
However, neither Meghan and Harry nor Winfrey have confirmed any forthcoming projects.
The couple recently returned to their permanent residence in the US after a brief visit to the UK earlier in the month to commemorate the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.
This visit marked the royal family’s first opportunity to meet Lilibet, the newest addition to the Sussex family, born in June last year.
The ongoing discourse surrounding Meghan and Harry’s titles persists, despite their decision to forego their HRH designations upon stepping down from senior royal roles.
While they retain the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles, questions linger regarding the appropriateness of these titles.
Meghan’s use of the Duchess title in her book, “The Bench,” reignited the debate over the couple’s nomenclature.
Koenig emphasized the need for a shift in their titles, citing examples from within the royal family and peerage.
She highlighted that individuals like Beatrice and Eugene opt not to use their titles professionally, instead identifying themselves as Beatrice York and Eugene York.
Similarly, Charles L. Spencer, despite his royal lineage, refrains from using his title in his literary works, choosing to be known as Charles Spencer.
Drawing from these precedents, Koenig recommended that Meghan and Harry consider adopting simpler titles, such as Meghan Sussex and Harry Sussex, aligning with common practices in the US.
In conclusion, the evolving narrative surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s titles underscores the complexities of navigating their identities post-royal transition.
The suggestion put forth by royal historian Marlene Koenig adds a new layer to the ongoing dialogue, prompting reflection on the couple’s public personas and professional identities.
As Meghan and Harry continue to carve out their path beyond the confines of traditional royal expectations, the debate over their titles serves as a focal point for discussions on modern royalty and identity in the public eye.