Renowned royal expert, Richard Eaton, has voiced his disapproval of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s unconventional tactics in securing an invitation to the royal Christmas festivities at Sandringham.

Eaton, who serves as the diary editor of the Daily Mail, likened their efforts to an awkward encounter at a school disco, describing it as absurd and potentially exacerbating existing tensions within the family.

Eaton expressed concern that if the couple does manage to secure an invitation, the public display of tensions will be inevitable and likely exploited by photographers.

He criticized their reliance on friends to communicate their desire to be invited, deeming it an inappropriate and ineffective approach.

Eaton emphasized the importance of direct communication when addressing matters with the royal family.

Drawing attention to a story in the Sunday Times, Eaton highlighted that the couple’s friends were reportedly expressing their desire to be invited to the king at Christmas.

He found this indirect form of communication strange and questioned why Meghan and Harry couldn’t express their desires directly.

Eaton encouraged listeners to empathize with the king, emphasizing that despite his royal status, he remains a human being.

Eaton humorously suggested that perhaps the couple could consider inviting the king to California instead of seeking a Sandringham Christmas invitation.

He speculated about the influence of Hollywood agents in shaping Meghan and Harry’s communication style, noting that in Hollywood, direct communication is often channeled through agents, lawyers, or other intermediaries.

Palace Confidential experts offered an alternative approach, suggesting that the Sussexes should make direct contact with other members of the royal family to express their desire to spend the holidays together.

They emphasized that direct communication would be more genuine and effective.

However, they doubted whether Harry and Meghan were prepared for such a direct and sincere approach, including an apology if necessary.

Richard Eden and the Palace Confidential experts criticized the indirect approach of letting information slip through friends, deeming it not constructive for mending relationships within the royal family.

Eden characterized this approach as a new low for Harry and Meghan, highlighting their apparent inability to communicate directly with the family.

Royal correspondent Rebecca English cautioned that it might not be the right time for the couple to publicly force a reconciliation with the royal family.

She highlighted the meticulous planning and lack of spontaneity within the royal family, making it unrealistic for Meghan and Harry to expect a last-minute inclusion.

English also pointed out that the couple’s history of criticizing the family for financial gain doesn’t align with the family’s interests.

English asserted that Christmas is a time for peaceful gatherings with beloved and trusted family members, which doesn’t seem to align with Harry and Meghan’s current relationship with the royal family.

The envisioned Christmas morning walk to church for Harry and Meghan seems mired in potential awkwardness, raising questions about their intentions and desired outcome.

Royal correspondent Natasha Livingston pointed out the infrequency of the king’s interactions with Harry and Meghan’s children, Archie and Lilibet, adding to the tensions.

Livingston suggested that the family estrangement might be linked to the king not having seen the grandchildren for an extended period.

She noted that given their proximity, he could spend more time with them, a prospect that everyone would likely welcome.

The segment concluded with Richard Eden discussing Meghan’s recent engagements, questioning the nature of her involvement in events centered around concerts or sporting activities.

He also highlighted a missed opportunity for Meghan and Harry during the recent state visit from the President and First Lady of South Korea, emphasizing the grandeur they could have participated in had they remained working members of the royal family.

Eden argued that as working royals, they possessed significant influence and recognition, a status they voluntarily relinquished.

Now, Meghan is perceived more as just another celebrity on the red carpet, potentially missing out on the unique and influential role they once held within the monarchy.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s unconventional approach to securing a Christmas invitation has drawn criticism from experts.

Their reliance on friends to convey their desires has been deemed inappropriate, and the experts emphasize the need for direct communication and sincere efforts if they genuinely wish to mend relationships with the royal family.

The tensions and complexities surrounding their potential attendance at Sandringham highlight the challenges they face in reestablishing a connection with the family.