In a surprising turn of events, it has been revealed that Meghan Markle copyrighted the name Lilibet even before she was pregnant, allegedly using the Queen’s nickname to monetize from the very beginning.

This revelation has not only contradicted details previously shared by the palace in a cooperatively written biography in 2022 but has also painted the late Queen Elizabeth in a way the public has never known her to be.

Yesterday, Omid Scobie, Meghan’s representative, expressed that these Lilibet revelations are not doing any favors for the memory of Queen Elizabeth.

While Meghan and Harry claim to have received permission from the Queen herself to use the name, they view this as yet another smear campaign against them.

However, without concrete evidence of the late Queen’s approval, skepticism remains.

It is worth noting that Scobie has made controversial claims in the past, such as suggesting that the late Queen’s body would be transported via train from Scotland while her body was still warm.

Additionally, he alleged that the Sussexes were involved in an 80-mile-per-hour car chase in Manhattan.

Given his track record, some question his credibility when it comes to discussing the late Queen.

According to a new book titled “Charles III, New King, New Court, The Inside Story” by Robert Hardman, Queen Elizabeth was reportedly furious when she discovered that Meghan and Harry had used her private nickname for their daughter.

Royal insider Angela Levin, speaking to GB News, described the Queen’s reaction as incredibly sad.

Levin further explained that Meghan had officially registered the names even before Lilibet was born, intending to use them for personal gain and identification purposes.

The revelation of Meghan copyrighting the name Lilibet has raised concerns about the Queen’s association with merchandising.

The name holds deep significance to the monarch, as it was a childhood nickname she couldn’t pronounce properly.

It also carries sentimental value for her family, including her parents and the late Duke of Edinburgh.

To those unaware of this intimate connection, it may appear that the Queen endorses the commercialization of her name, which many find appalling.

Levin expressed her disappointment, considering Meghan’s actions as a disrespectful move against the Queen.

She believes that Meghan’s motive behind copyrighting the name was to seek revenge for not being treated as she believed she should have been within the royal family.

The fact that Meghan registered the domain lilibetdiana.com before her daughter’s birth only adds to the perception of her twisted intentions.

As the truth unfolds, it is unlikely that any reputable brand or individual would want to associate themselves with someone who seemingly caused pain to a dying Queen Elizabeth by appropriating her name for personal gain.

Meghan’s calculated plan to maximize profits through merchandising has backfired, leaving her with limited opportunities in that realm.

However, concerns remain about what Meghan may have in store for Lilibet in the future.

It is revealed that Meghan decided on the name Lilibet after seeing an envelope placed on Prince Philip’s coffin, bearing the affectionate nickname.

The world initially viewed this as a touching gesture, but Meghan saw an opportunity for merchandising and wasted no time in registering related websites through her lawyers.

The controversy surrounding the copyrighting of Lilibet’s name not only tarnishes Meghan’s reputation but also raises questions about her intentions and the respect she holds for the late Queen Elizabeth.

The fallout from this revelation will undoubtedly continue to unfold, leaving many wondering what lies ahead for Meghan and her daughter.