In a recent interview on GMB, author and commentator Tom Bauer expressed his disapproval of Meghan Markle’s influence over Prince Harry’s memoir, Spare.

He went as far as accusing the former suit star of exploiting her royal title for personal gain.

Despite Prince Harry’s claim to retain his princely title, Bauer insisted that it is Meghan who is truly in control of the book’s agenda.

He boldly stated that the memoir is essentially Meghan’s, suggesting that she has dictated its content.

However, Tessa Dumlop and Ed Balls challenged Bauer’s assertions, pointing out that the book is authored by Harry himself, not Meghan.

Undeterred, Bauer stood by his claims, questioning whether Harry had even read the book, as he believes it to be ghostwritten.

In contrast, he lauded Meghan’s intelligence and sophistication, emphasizing her active involvement in the project.

Bauer also claimed that Queen Elizabeth II saw through Meghan’s intentions, despite Dunlop’s counterargument that the late monarch wanted Harry and Meghan to retain their royal titles.

He further noted that other members of the royal family, including William, Charles, and Diana’s brother Charles Spencer, were also skeptical of Meghan’s motivations.

Jonathan Sacerdoti, another expert, criticized Prince Harry’s choice of title for his memoir, suggesting that it seemed to tap into the trend of victimhood.

Sacerdoti expressed hope that, given Harry’s therapy and new life away from royal duties, he would have moved on and chosen a different title.

He found the chosen title, “Spare,” to be catchy but ultimately sad, as it perpetuates the narrative of victimhood.

Sacerdoti speculated that Harry may be trying to appeal to a specific audience with this choice.

Contrary to the title’s implications, Sacerdoti argued that Harry was not treated as a spare in the eyes of many, even during his time as a working royal.

He highlighted Harry’s popularity and the respect he garnered for his military service.

Harry’s role allowed him to pursue his interests, enjoy a vibrant social life, and still fulfill his responsibilities as a working member of the royal family.

Sacerdoti noted that Harry had more freedom to express his personality compared to his brother William, who carried the weight of future kingship.

Harry had a defined and rewarding role within the royal family, rather than being relegated to a spare position.

Sacerdoti raised the question of whether Harry now feels like a spare in his new life.

He often appears to play second fiddle to his actress wife, Meghan, and her various ambitions, such as hosting audio programs, writing picture books, and potentially entering politics in America.

In the public eye, Harry sometimes appears as a supporting character, commenting on hairstyles or engaging in light-hearted antics outside a window.

Additionally, expert Tom Slater criticized the paradoxical nature of Harry’s private life.

Despite seeking privacy, Harry frequently speaks out about his personal experiences, positioning himself as a victim of the therapeutic era.

Slater expressed concern that this portrayal is detrimental to both Harry and the royal family, as it contradicts their efforts to move on and establish a private life.

He emphasized the irony of constantly discussing one’s experiences in the media and releasing ghost-written biographies while aiming for privacy.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s influence over Prince Harry’s memoir has sparked controversy and accusations of exploiting her royal title.

While some argue that Harry’s book is solely his own, others maintain that Meghan has dictated its agenda.