Amidst reports circulating, Meghan Markle has expressed strong disapproval towards the appointment of Mike Tyndall as patron by Invictus Games CEO Scott Moore.

The move is widely interpreted as a snub directed at Prince Harry, sparking controversy and speculation within royal circles.

The Invictus Games, founded by Prince Harry in 2014 with the aim of highlighting the resilience of wounded servicemen and women, has greatly benefited from his role as founder and advocate.

However, the recent decision made by Moore is viewed as an effort to sideline Prince Harry, a concern that Meghan directly addressed to Moore, emphasizing the importance of preserving Prince’s involvement at all costs.

The selection of Mike Tyndall as the new patron has evoked a range of reactions from the public.

While some see it as an opportunity to bring in fresh perspectives and generate more interest in the event, others perceive it as a departure from Prince Harry’s legacy and his deep engagement with the Games.

Social media platforms are buzzing with supporters of Prince Harry expressing their discontent through hashtags such as #InvictusForHarry and #KeepHarryInvictus, fearing that this decision could sever his ties to the philanthropic causes he passionately advocates for.

The discord stemming from the Invictus Games controversy once again illuminates the ongoing tensions between the Sussexes and other members of the royal family.

Meghan’s opposition in this matter is seen as a continuation of the existing strains within Buckingham Palace, yet she remains steadfast in ensuring Prince Harry’s continued active participation.

Speculation abounds regarding the implications of Prince Harry stepping down as the patron of the Invictus Games on his future involvement with the event.

While some anticipate a potential distancing, others hold out hope for a resolution that preserves his role.