Renowned biographer Tom Bauer has strongly criticized Meghan Markle for allegedly misusing her HRH title during her recent tour in Nigeria.
Bauer’s disapproval stems from what he sees as the couple’s self-serving behavior and exploitation of their royal ties for personal gain.
His remarks have struck a chord with those who feel that Meghan and Harry are leveraging their humanitarian work as a cover for self-promotion and financial benefit.
While mainstream media typically shies away from such discussions, critics like Bauer are determined to uncover the truth that the so-called Sussex Squad seeks to suppress.
The focus now shifts to Meghan and Harry’s photo-op tour in Nigeria, where critics argue that the couple once again utilized their HRH titles to attract unwarranted attention.
Meghan’s statement about relating to all Nigerians has faced backlash, with some viewing it as undermining the struggles of those who have experienced real poverty, unlike her privileged upbringing in Los Angeles.
Bauer contends that this Nigerian excursion was another avenue for the couple to disrespect and embarrass the British royal family, highlighting their tendency to center everything around themselves at the monarchy’s expense.
Moreover, Bauer raises concerns about the transparency of their foundation and the relatively modest amount of charitable funds it has distributed.
He suggests that their motives are more aligned with strategic branding decisions rather than a genuine commitment to making a positive impact.
The couple’s perceived sense of entitlement and lack of substantial achievements beyond their royal status have not gone unnoticed by their critics.
Meghan, who hails from a life of privilege, gained recognition primarily through her acting career, while Harry’s royal background has overshadowed any personal accomplishments.
Despite this, they have rebranded themselves as advocates for the marginalized, despite their considerable wealth and comfort.
Their apparent disregard for the institution that propelled them to fame has raised eyebrows among detractors.
Bauer goes as far as labeling them as victims of their own avarice and toxicity, as they continue to disparage the royal family to stay relevant in the public eye.
Their recent actions, including a Netflix series critical of the Commonwealth followed by engagements with Commonwealth nations such as Nigeria, have been met with skepticism.
Bauer commends Prince Charles for maintaining a distance from Harry during his recent UK visit, hinting at Harry’s potential exploitation of the situation for personal gain.
Criticism mounts against Meghan for failing to acknowledge or honor her ancestral nation, along with her apparent lack of remorse for disregarding the institutions she was once part of.
Many view their conduct as shameless and predictable, driven solely by a pursuit of immediate financial gain and public attention.
Detractors argue that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, lacking significant personal achievements or societal contributions, rely on their royal connections and titles to sustain their relevance.