In a highly anticipated interview on CBS Sunday Morning, Meghan Markle found herself in the hot seat as veteran journalist Jane Polly pressed her for proof of her children’s existence.

The Duchess of Sussex, known for her protective stance on family privacy, appeared taken aback and visibly uncomfortable when confronted with the demand for tangible evidence of Archie and Lilibet, her two young kids with Prince Harry.

The conversation began with a planned discussion about the Archwell Foundation, but Polly quickly pivoted to a more provocative line of questioning.

She pointed out that despite Meghan and Harry’s intentions to shield their children from the public eye, Archie and Lilibet have been notably absent from media coverage.

“Do you understand why some might question their existence?” Polly asked, catching Meghan off guard.

While Meghan has openly spoken about the intense scrutiny and cyberbullying her family endures, Polly’s inquiries seemed to strike a nerve.

With a quivering voice, Meghan insisted, “My children are absolutely real.

Our focus is on Archie and Lilibet.” She emphasized their choice to keep the kids away from the spotlight to ensure they lead a normal childhood, free from the pressures of fame.

However, Polly didn’t relent.

She highlighted the lack of photographic evidence and the couple’s reluctance to share updates about their children.

“Some skeptics argue that your selective sharing raises doubts.

Doesn’t that seem a bit suspicious?” she challenged, as Meghan struggled to maintain her composure amidst the escalating tension.

The Duchess reiterated her commitment to her family’s privacy, stating that their safety and well-being supersede any public curiosity.

“Nothing is more important than that,” she declared firmly, asserting her refusal to expose her children to unwanted attention or mistreatment.

Yet, Polly continued to press her point.

“If you don’t provide any concrete evidence, won’t that just fuel speculation and conspiracy theories?” she asked pointedly.

Meghan’s discomfort was palpable as the interviewer suggested that their silence could be interpreted as evasive or irresponsible.

This unexpected turn in the dialogue has sparked a heated debate among viewers.

Supporters of Meghan have criticized Polly and CBS for what they perceive as aggressive questioning and harassment of the royal family.

On the flip side, skeptics have praised Polly for her tenacity, arguing that the public deserves transparency regarding Meghan and Harry’s parenting claims.

As the interview unfolded, it became clear that the stakes were high for both Meghan and Polly.

The former actress was tasked with defending her family’s choices while navigating the complexities of public perception.

Meanwhile, Polly aimed to uphold journalistic integrity by seeking accountability from the couple.