Recent claims regarding Meghan Markle’s supposed anger over not receiving a share of the Duchy of Cornwall’s income have reignited an old rumor, one that many royal watchers find utterly ridiculous.
This narrative first surfaced after Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral, sparking whispers that Meghan and Prince Harry had ambitions to divert some of the Duchy’s funds their way.
However, experts and insiders have largely dismissed this notion as mere speculation, deeming it both unlikely and implausible.
Royal commentator Emily Andrews emphasizes the absurdity of the idea that Meghan and Harry could be angling for a slice of the Duchy’s income.
The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate traditionally designated to support the heir to the throne and their immediate family.
It’s simply not something that would be shared with other royal family members, especially those who have stepped back from their royal duties.
The revival of this rumor has once again placed Meghan squarely in the media spotlight, with some outlets portraying her as a disgruntled figure intent on extracting more financial benefits from the royal family.
According to royal historian Sarah Gristwood, Meghan has consistently been cast as the antagonist in this narrative, depicted as someone who seeks to undermine the monarchy while wanting more for herself and her family.
However, the reality is that the Duchy of Cornwall has never been accessible to Meghan and Harry, regardless of their royal status.
Established in the 14th century, the Duchy serves to provide an income for the heir to the throne, making it the exclusive domain of the Prince of Wales and their immediate family—a tradition that has persisted for centuries.
Royal finance expert David McClure clarifies that the Duchy is not a public fund that can be easily divided or shared.
It is a private estate managed by the heir to the throne to support their official duties and personal expenses.
Therefore, any suggestion that Meghan and Harry might have a legitimate claim to these funds is simply detached from reality.
Despite this, rumors about Meghan’s alleged desire to tap into the Duchy’s resources continue to fuel tensions between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.
Royal biographer Penny Junor points out a recurring theme where Meghan is portrayed as greedy and demanding, always trying to take more than her fair share.
The very idea of Meghan and Harry seeking a portion of the Duchy’s income contradicts their stated goal of achieving financial independence.
After all, one of the primary reasons they stepped back from royal duties was to become self-sufficient, no longer reliant on public funds or the monarchy’s resources.
Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams notes that if Meghan and Harry genuinely aimed for financial independence, it would be illogical for them to pursue a share of the Duchy.
Such a move would undermine their credibility and contradict their chosen path.
As the Sussexes navigate their new lives outside the royal fold, the scrutiny they face only intensifies.
Meghan and Harry remain polarizing figures, and the media is quick to seize upon any perceived misstep or controversy, amplifying it to the public.
Victoria Arbiter, a royal commentator, underscores that the couple remains very much in the public eye.
Any hint of scandal or controversy surrounding them is magnified, fueling ongoing debates about their roles and responsibilities in the absence of royal titles.
This situation highlights the complexities of Meghan’s portrayal in the media.
Royal historian Robert Lacey suggests that the ongoing efforts to depict her as the villain in this saga oversimplify a far more intricate narrative.
The truth is often more nuanced than the headlines suggest, and the dynamics within the royal family are anything but straightforward.