Is there anything about Meghan Markle that doesn’t spark controversy?
Whether it’s her foray into horology or her frequent appearances in tabloids, it seems like she’s always in the spotlight.
Recently, a new claim has surfaced regarding her time on the set of “Suits,” where she allegedly wore her own jewelry.
But was this just a harmless show of personal flair or something more dubious?
Markle, who played Rachel Zane on the popular series, mentioned that she brought her own jewelry to the set back in 2013, long before Prince Harry entered the picture.
She told Mar-C-L-A, “All the jewelry that I wear on the show is my own personal jewelry and family heirlooms,” including cherished pieces like her grandmother’s charm bracelet and a signet ring.
It sounds touching, doesn’t it?
However, a closer look reveals some inconsistencies.
Critics have pointed out that many of the jewelry items she wore, such as the J. N. A. Terrell necklaces, were custom-made specifically for “Suits.”
This raises questions about whether her claims of wearing family heirlooms are merely an embellishment aimed at creating a more relatable image.
But the story doesn’t end there.
In a 2015 interview with Hello!, Meghan shared her excitement over purchasing a Cartier tank watch after “Suits” was renewed for its third season.
She proudly stated that she splurged on a two-tone version and even had it engraved with “2MM from MM,” intending to pass it down to her daughter one day.
Yet, watch enthusiasts might cringe at her reference to it as a “French tank.” While the Cartier tank is indeed a classic, calling it a French tank feels more like a misstep than a fashion statement.
This little slip might have flown under the radar for many, but it’s a glaring error for those in the know.
Either Meghan is genuinely unaware of her luxury items’ specifics, or she’s playing a clever game of catch-up in the world of high fashion.
And then there’s that inscription—how many heirlooms come with a personalized message declaring their sentimental value?
It’s almost as if she was preparing for a moment when everyone would recognize her initials.
The notion that Meghan might have acquired jewelry just for “Suits” raises eyebrows.
Was she subtly signaling to designers that she could offer them free publicity in exchange for some shiny new pieces?
After all, what better way to enhance her wardrobe than by letting the costume department know she had it all covered?
In true “Suits” fashion, perhaps Meghan treated those jewelry items like party favors, a little thank-you gift for her rising star status.
The practice of borrowing items with the intention of keeping them, known as “merking,” isn’t unheard of in the industry.
So, was she simply playing the game, or is there more to the story?
Adding another layer to the intrigue is Meghan’s supposed fluency in French.
She once claimed to be proficient in the language, but when a film crew in Montreal started conversing in French, she reportedly felt lost.
Tom Bauer’s book “Revenge” suggested that she was quite frustrated by her inability to keep up, raising further questions about her linguistic claims.
Did she really study French for eight years, or was it more like four?
Ultimately, the question remains: Did Meghan Markle take jewelry from the “Suits” set?
The truth may be elusive.
With the mix-up over the French tank watch, the dubious family heirloom claims, and her multilingual misadventures, one thing stands out.
Meghan has a talent for crafting narratives about herself that often seem a bit too polished or exaggerated.
As the headlines continue to swirl, it’s clear that Meghan Markle will remain a subject of fascination and scrutiny.
Whether it’s her jewelry choices or her language skills, every detail seems to invite speculation.
And in the world of celebrity, that’s a recipe for endless intrigue.