In recent months, Meghan Markle has been spotted at a handful of public events, but there’s a recurring theme that raises eyebrows.

Each appearance seems to underscore her self-proclaimed victim narrative, which, let’s be honest, is becoming a bit hard to swallow.

Let’s break down what’s happening here.

First up was Meghan’s attendance at a polo match back in April, followed by her much-discussed trip to Nigeria and her appearance at the ESPY Awards.

While she looked strikingly thin—perhaps too thin—what stands out even more is her wardrobe choice.

A palette dominated by whites, beiges, and other neutral tones has become her signature look lately.

It’s almost as if she’s trying to make a statement, but what message is she really sending?

During her Netflix series, Meghan often claimed that her muted color choices were a way to avoid drawing attention to herself while fulfilling royal duties.

She expressed how she felt obligated to wear colors like beige and camel to adhere to royal protocol.

“I rarely wore color,” she stated, suggesting that her subdued wardrobe was a means of blending in rather than standing out.

But hold on a second.

If blending in was truly her goal, wouldn’t one think she’d choose something more vibrant when not under the royal spotlight?

Meghan’s assertion that she was bullied into wearing these colors feels somewhat disingenuous.

After all, this is the same woman who thrives on being in the limelight.

She has painted herself as the ultimate victim, claiming that her wardrobe choices were dictated by the royal family’s expectations.

Yet, it’s hard to reconcile that image with the fact that she continues to don these muted tones even after stepping away from royal duties.

Could it be that she simply has an affinity for these colors, rather than a desperate need to fit in?

Moreover, Meghan’s past comments about wanting to avoid embarrassing the royal family ring hollow.

If anything, her actions have repeatedly drawn attention to herself, making it seem like she enjoys the drama.

The narrative that she was merely trying to assimilate into royal life doesn’t quite hold water when you consider her history of seeking the spotlight.

As we look ahead, one can’t help but wonder what will happen if Meghan and Prince Harry’s marriage takes a turn for the worse.

If she’s already claiming victimhood over such trivial matters, what will she say when faced with the very real challenges of a divorce?

Will she paint Harry as the villain in her story, perhaps blaming him for her struggles or health issues?

This pattern of behavior could put Harry in a precarious position, especially if Meghan decides to adopt a more combative approach.

With her penchant for dramatizing her experiences, one can only speculate how she would narrate their separation.

It’s a troubling thought, given her history of portraying herself as the wronged party.

Some observers have even gone so far as to liken her style choices to that of a cartoon character, suggesting that her wardrobe reflects a lack of creativity or individuality.

The comparison to SpongeBob SquarePants may be a stretch, but it does highlight her fixation on beige and muted tones, raising questions about her personal aesthetic.

Critics have pointed out that the royal family isn’t solely defined by muted colors.

While the Queen famously favored bright hues, other royals often sport similar palettes to Meghan’s.

So, what’s the real story behind her fashion choices?

Is it truly about fitting in, or is it just her preferred style?

One compelling question remains: why aren’t journalists holding Meghan accountable for what many see as blatant hypocrisy?

There seems to be a hesitance within the media to challenge her on these contradictions.

Perhaps it’s due to the power she and Harry wield over their narrative, making outlets wary of crossing them.

As Meghan continues to navigate her post-royal life, her wardrobe choices and victim narratives will likely remain focal points.

It’s a fascinating saga that leaves us questioning the authenticity of her claims and the true motivations behind her carefully curated public persona.

What will she say next?

Only time will tell.