The palace has always been slow to respond to crises, and this has given Meghan Markle a significant advantage.

However, there are ways to prevent the disaster that is looming, without resorting to extreme measures.

One criticism from royal commentators is the decision by William and Catherine to bring a CEO on board.

While opinions differ, I believe this move is commendable.

William’s choice to hire non-aristocrats as high-level aides demonstrates his strategic thinking and understanding of the benefits of diverse backgrounds.

One area where a CEO could greatly contribute is crisis management.

Successful corporations have shown that being able to anticipate and address crises is crucial for survival.

Currently, the palace is filled with aristocratic men in gray suits, all with similar backgrounds, competing to serve their respective royals.

This history of quiet conversations and whispers has led to unresolved problems.

The ongoing damage caused by Meghan Markle, with her antisocial and sociopathic personality disorders, is undoubtedly a crisis for the institution, comparable to the Duke of Windsor’s association with Hitler.

The question arises: why would millions of people read Meghan’s book filled with lies?

It seems there are entities, both foreign and domestic, individuals and groups, who seek to damage the monarchy and the UK government.

Concerns are also raised about King Charles III’s ability to handle such a crisis.

Meghan has identified his weaknesses, evident in her power play during the wedding planning.

By convincing him to let her walk halfway down the aisle alone, she realized she had leverage over him.

While some praised her for asserting herself, others found it appalling that he did not stand firm as the future king.

Meghan may fear two members of the royal family: Catherine and William.

Despite one being elderly and the other not in the line of succession, they pose a significant threat to her.

Both possess the capability to handle crises, making them formidable opponents.

However, there have been instances where crises were mishandled, such as the false accusation involving Lady Susan Hussey.

This incident highlighted the need for a better crisis management team.

Meghan’s relentless behavior cannot be stopped by paying hush money.

It would not prevent her from speaking out, and it would only confirm suspicions of a cover-up.

Instead, the palace must take preemptive strikes against her.

They could release the bullying report, link credible sources to information about Meghan and her mother’s background, and clarify the use of surrogates as a means to protect privacy.

Additionally, reaffirming the legitimacy of the line of succession would be a powerful move.

Time, if utilized wisely, can be a valuable weapon in this battle.

Regardless of how events unfold, Harry is likely to be collateral damage.

Meghan’s book will undoubtedly contain damaging revelations about his personal life, including alleged s**ual proclivities, drug abuse, and spousal abuse.

The home videos created by Meghan and her mother provide a glimpse into the content of the book, which will also include fabricated stories about royal homes and behind closed doors.

The king’s reputation will suffer greatly, just as the late queen’s heart was broken by the Oprah interview.

In conclusion, offering hush money as a solution is ineffective.

It is crucial for those with authority to devise and implement a plan to stop Meghan Markle.

Time is of the essence, and the monarchy’s survival depends on proactive measures.

The opinions shared by viewers highlight the need for Harry to take responsibility for his actions, the difficulty in rebuilding trust, and the public’s disdain for Meghan.

The king’s decision regarding Harry’s return to Great Britain will shape his reign and the monarchy’s future.