Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s foray into Hollywood has been far from successful, leading many to wonder what the future holds for the royal couple.

As critics analyze their every move, one expert suggests that the duo may continue to play the role of saints in an attempt to rehabilitate their image.

Kinsey Schofield, a royal expert, points out the flaws in Meghan and Harry’s constant comparison to Harry’s late mother, Princess Diana.

“The constant complaining, the glossy Netflix billboards,” Schofield explains, “their brands are totally not comparable, despite them constantly telling us that they’re Princess Diana 2.0.”

While the Sussexes have struggled professionally, they have managed to profit off their family drama since leaving the UK.

However, it seems that their income is not solely derived from their personal ventures.

The couple has also been involved in charity funding, with Meghan and Harry recently releasing a mission statement expressing their support for ethical journalism.

But Lady C, a source close to the matter, reveals a shocking revelation.

According to her, James Holt, a member of their team, received an exorbitant salary increase because he helped the couple conceal a significant amount of money stolen from charity.

Lady C believes that the Markles disguised these funds as donations, then transferred them to a holding account where they would accumulate interest for the named account holders, while also benefiting from tax breaks.

The bulk of the money would then be funneled back into their Archworld account.

Lady C further questions the financial practices of the Sussexes.

She points out the lack of interest income on an $8 million balance, with only $4,141 credited as interest.

This raises suspicions about potential money laundering or illicit movement of funds.

Lady C argues that any US charity allowing such a low return on capital would face severe criticism and be deemed derelict in its duties.

According to Lady C, the majority, if not all, of the donations received by Archworld are sourced from the Markles themselves.

This allows them to benefit from personal tax breaks.

The funds are then transferred to a holding account, not in the name of Archworld, where the named account holders can earn interest.

At the end of the year, the money is added back into the organization’s account.

While this may pass legal scrutiny for American charity funds, Lady C questions its ethical implications.

Additionally, Lady C highlights concerns regarding Archworld’s staffing and financial management.

With three full-time employees, the organization appears to be overstaffed based on the cited projects.

Public donations amounting to $911 raise further eyebrows.

Moreover, Archworld’s legal costs do not align with the mentioned projects, raising doubts about their financial transparency.

As the revelations surrounding Meghan Markle’s high salary to James Holt come to light, it becomes increasingly clear that the Sussexes’ financial practices warrant scrutiny.

With allegations of concealing money and questionable financial management, the future of the couple’s philanthropic endeavors remains uncertain.

Only time will tell how these revelations will impact their image and standing within the public eye.