In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle’s agency announced on Friday that she could be featuring a mysterious child in a new Netflix series.
This revelation has left many wondering who exactly she will borrow to portray her own children.
It is worth noting that Meghan previously announced her pregnancy, but a month later, it was revealed that she had used a surrogate and even wore a fake baby bump.
Given what we now know about Meghan, this kind of deception seems entirely plausible.
A source close to the situation also disclosed that Meghan refused to be examined by any doctors associated with the royal family once she claimed to be pregnant at Princess Eugenie’s wedding.
Instead, she opted not to utilize the Queen’s doctors.
The palace, seemingly unable to intervene, had no choice but to go along with her decision.
They were cautious about upsetting the Harkle (Harry and Meghan) in any way.
It is doubtful that Meghan even informed the palace about the doctors she had chosen, making it difficult for discreet inquiries to be made.
There are numerous suspicious signs surrounding Meghan’s pregnancy.
The haste with which everything unfolded raises questions.
One possibility is that the royal family recommended announcing a miscarriage to cover up the use of a surrogate.
However, knowing Meghan’s desire for attention, it is likely that she rejected this suggestion in favor of basking in the limelight of being pregnant.
The royal family, perhaps coerced in some way, found themselves entangled in a web of lies.
The fake belly, discrepancies in dates, the peculiar birth certificate, and the strange story involving the obstetrician all contribute to an extensive list of inconsistencies.
It is clear that a cover-up was orchestrated.
The Harkle made the announcement at Princess Eugenie’s wedding and promptly departed for Australia.
Meghan spent part of her pregnancy outside of London.
Furthermore, Prince Harry did not personally announce the birth of their child.
Instead, he made the announcement and handed over the necessary documents.
Even those skilled in crisis management would struggle to handle the situation if the surrogacy rumors are indeed true.
The idea of such a stunt being pulled seems unimaginable, let alone dealing with the aftermath.
If proven, it would undoubtedly go down as one of the greatest hoaxes in history.
These revelations follow a claim by a royal commentator that King Charles subtly addressed Prince Harry in his Christmas address.
Angela Levant, speaking on GB News, stated that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex closely scrutinized the King’s speech, hoping to find any slight error.
Charles deliberately chose not to directly mention or show pictures of Harry and Meghan.
However, he did quote from the Bible, saying, “Do unto others as you would have done unto yourself.”
Levant perceived this as a subtle hint intended for Harry.
It is highly likely that Harry was watching the speech, eagerly searching for any signs of inclusion or a picture of himself and Meghan.
This would provide an opportunity for them to create a fuss if they felt excluded.
In his second Christmas speech since ascending the throne, the King focused on individuals who went the extra mile to help those around them.
The video accompanying Charles’ speech showcased highlights from his past years, including planting a tree during a trip to Kenya and his first state visit as monarch with Queen Camilla to a Commonwealth country.
Notably absent were Harry and Meghan, highlighting the continued strain between the royal establishment and the Sussexes.