In a shocking revelation, Meghan Markle finds herself embroiled in a nightmare as accusations regarding her son’s parentage surface.
A Twitter user claimed that Meghan is the biological mother of a royal child, and she is furious with the alleged fake mother who poses as Archie’s real mom.
The user even suggested that Meghan wishes to see this imposter, known as the demon Meg, behind bars to face punishment for her crimes.
As a journalist, I believe the child in question is none other than Archie, who is believed to have been born via surrogacy.
The evidence supporting Meghan’s biological connection to Archie is intriguing.
During a podcast called Archetypes, Meghan confessed that she had a fondness for Archie comic books during her childhood.
She revealed that she loved redheads, which is evident in her son’s name.
Although Archie is not directly named after the comic books, Meghan admitted to collecting them and now reads them to her son.
However, recent events have cast doubt on Meghan’s claims.
A photograph has emerged, allegedly showing Meghan forcing Archie to pose as if he were reading a book.
Some skeptics argue that the photo was manipulated through photoshopping, pointing out the missing foot and the chopped-off portion of Meghan’s face.
Yet, the most concerning aspect of the picture is Meghan’s firm grip on the child’s back.
This controlling posture was also observed during the July 4 celebration when Archie appeared unable to stand without being held back.
Additionally, it is worth noting that the child rarely smiles in photographs, leading to further speculation.
Another image, captured a few months ago, depicts Archie with Meghan and another woman at a computer.
In this picture, the child appears on the verge of tears.
Observers claim that Archie was positioned unnaturally for the photo, displaying no interest in the book or the activity.
It seems he was held in place while someone quickly snapped a few shots.
Regardless of whether the photo was manipulated or not, the uncomfortable posture and surroundings raise concerns.
The furniture layout in the photo is peculiar, with the seat they are on seemingly tucked in at the back of the sofa.
Both Meghan and Archie appear hunched up and unsupported, clinging to the edge of the seat.
The child seems to be slipping off, attempting to escape his constrained position.
Furthermore, it raises questions as to how Meghan manages to turn the pages with one hand holding Archie and the other holding the book.
It gives the impression that this was a rushed attempt to capture a photo.
Interestingly, the family dog in the background seems to have a sense of what is happening.
This leads me to believe that Archie may have been born to a surrogate.
Several factors support this theory.
Firstly, Meghan’s baby bump seemed to change in size frequently and even disappeared entirely during her visit to New York for her baby shower.
Additionally, Meghan was filmed running up a flight of stairs in stiletto heels when she was allegedly seven months pregnant, which some argue is an impossible feat.
Even though I am not an athlete, I can attest that pregnancy significantly affects balance.
Furthermore, Harry’s comment about the baby’s rapid changes over two weeks, the lack of protocols surrounding the due date and the doctor’s presence, and the existence of a fake birth certificate on the internet all contribute to the speculation.
If Archie were indeed born to a surrogate, he would not be eligible for the royal line of succession.
However, since he is part of the line, it suggests that Meghan is his biological mother.
This raises doubts about the authenticity of the entire royal family, as well as everyone involved in signing Archie’s birth certificate.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s parentage of Archie has ignited a heated debate.
While some argue that the evidence points to Archie being born via surrogacy, others maintain that Meghan is his biological mother.
The truth remains elusive, leaving us to ponder the likelihood of either scenario.