Meghan Markle’s highly anticipated podcast, “Archewell Audio,” has been met with skepticism and doubts about its success.

With comparisons to the failed project “40×40,” concerns arise that this venture may suffer a similar fate.

Despite the initial buzz and celebrity endorsements, there are signs that this podcast could go up in flames.

One glaring issue is Markle’s apparent penchant for dishonesty.

Her constant stream of falsehoods raises questions about her ability to navigate diplomatic and political circles on a global scale.

The role of a royal requires effective communication, spokesperson skills, and backchannel diplomacy.

Yet, Markle seems more concerned about her own emotions than fulfilling her duties.

To exemplify the contrast, Serena Williams, a true archetype, continued to perform even after breaking her arm.

She fulfilled her obligations, honoring contractual commitments.

In contrast, Markle’s dismissive responses to important stories indicate her lack of genuine interest in the podcast’s content.

It appears she fails to wholeheartedly embrace the “nutmeg and ginger show.”

Furthermore, Markle’s inability to keep confidential information under wraps is a cause for concern.

She may believe she cleverly disguises her insults, but they are transparent to those paying attention.

Her background remains a topic of interest, and it is likely that those in power possess more knowledge about her than she thinks.

Hubris often leads to downfall, and Markle’s lies will inevitably unravel, much like they did during her interview with Oprah.

The credibility of Markle’s podcast is also at stake.

Allegations surrounding the authenticity of certain stories, such as the heater incident, the housing situation, the weather, and the portrayal of the nanny and staff, cast doubt on the truthfulness of her narratives.

Spotify, having faced controversies with Joe Rogan and Neil Young, cannot afford to lose subscribers due to Markle’s questionable content.

Moreover, the description and blurb for “Archewell Audio” fail to impress.

They come across as poorly written and lacking the sophistication expected from a groundbreaking project.

Markle’s belief that she coined the term “archetypes” reveals her misunderstanding of its historical significance.

She seems unaware that the word has existed for centuries and does not align with her intended meaning.

The podcast’s branding falls short of its intended impact.

Criticism has poured in since the podcast’s launch, with Meghan McCain, an American television personality and author, penning a scathing review for the Mail Online.

McCain asserts that the majority of Americans are indifferent to the Sussexes’ endeavors, regardless of their efforts.

While she acknowledges Markle’s soothing voice, McCain questions whether the podcast will invite diverse perspectives and engage in meaningful debates.

She points out that Serena Williams, featured in one episode, has never been labeled “too ambitious” due to her undeniable talent and success.

McCain concludes by pondering whether the podcast’s exorbitant price tag is truly justified.

As Markle’s podcast faces mounting criticism, its future hangs in the balance.

Will it overcome the obstacles and prove its worth, or will it succumb to the same fate as its ill-fated predecessor?

Only time will tell if “Archewell Audio” can rise above the doubts and deliver the engaging content it promises.