Rumors have been circulating that the partnership between Spotify and Meghan Markle is on shaky ground.

Royal expert Neil Sean recently shared his thoughts, suggesting that if Meghan doesn’t increase her collaboration with Prince Harry, her podcast could be in jeopardy.

It was previously reported that Meghan had expressed interest in featuring Catherine, the Princess of Wales, on her podcast, although it is unclear if this will ever come to fruition.

Meanwhile, Prince Harry surprised listeners by making an impromptu appearance on another podcast, with Spotify expressing interest in having him on board.

The bottom line for the streaming platform is that they are not concerned about the format of his involvement; they simply want to capitalize on the royal connection that has faded away all too quickly.

In order to regain their momentum, Spotify believes that Meghan needs to drop a bombshell with a major interview.

And, as royal expert Neil Sean pointed out, now seems like the perfect time.

However, Meghan Markle’s podcast seems to be losing steam rapidly.

It has dropped to number 19 on Spotify’s top podcasts chart, and only one episode sits at number 52 on the list of top 100 podcast episodes.

Listeners have expressed their dissatisfaction, finding the podcast to be rather dull.

It appears that Spotify may not renew their contract with Meghan, as they were hoping for more impactful content in return for the investment already made.

They are not willing to chase after Meghan to complete her obligations.

Furthermore, Meghan’s recent claim on her podcast that labeling someone as difficult is misogynistic has faced scrutiny from a royal correspondent.

Richard Palmer from the Daily Express suggests that Meghan is attempting to rewrite history through her podcast episodes.

He points out that Meghan was primarily labeled as difficult by women who worked for her within the palace and the royal household.

By claiming that it is misogynistic to label women as difficult, Meghan is disregarding the fact that it was mostly women who assigned her that label.

This pattern of attempting to rewrite history has garnered significant interest in Meghan’s podcast.

In addition, royal expert Ingrid Seward argues that Meghan always puts on a show for the cameras.

Seward believes that one of the reasons Meghan struggled within the royal family was her refusal to listen and her strong desire to have her voice heard, which was not always possible.

However, through her podcast, she now has the platform to express herself.

Seward hopes that Meghan and Harry are genuinely happy, but she also suggests that Meghan’s constant acting may be detrimental to their relationship.

Trust is a crucial foundation in any relationship, and Meghan’s inclination towards acting may hinder that trust.

Seward further criticizes Meghan, stating that she comes across as a phony.

According to her, Meghan portrays herself as the perfect 1950s mother, constantly playing a role.

Seward questions Meghan’s authenticity, noting that she never seems to stop acting.

While these words may sound harsh, it is worth mentioning that Meghan has made equally if not more severe remarks about her own family and in-laws.

It seems that much of what she says is later refuted.

One wonders why she bothers to make such claims in the first place.

For instance, Meghan once claimed that South Africans celebrated her wedding in the streets, comparing it to Nelson Mandela’s release.

However, there is no evidence to support this.

She also alleged that the Archbishop of Canterbury broke his vows for her, which has been proven false.

It begs the question: are these little white lies reminiscent of the deceptive nature seen in 1950s sitcoms?

Perhaps someone should enlighten Meghan on this matter.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s podcast is facing significant challenges, with rumors swirling about the status of her deal with Spotify.

The streaming platform is looking for a way to revive the royal stardust they initially sought.

Meghan’s podcast has dropped in popularity, and listeners find it uninteresting.