Meghan Markle’s potential foray into U.S. politics has resurfaced, with her PR team working tirelessly to promote her as a viable candidate.

Despite the absurdity of the notion, they seem determined to keep the dream alive.

The Express recently published an article suggesting that Meghan could have filled the Senate seat left vacant by Dianne Feinstein’s passing, although Gavin Newsom ultimately chose someone else on an interim basis.

Nevertheless, the rumor mill continues to churn, fueled by Meghan and her PR team.

One cannot help but question the basis for this revival of interest in Meghan’s political ambitions.

Who exactly is behind this push?

Is it Meghan herself or her team?

The article claims that Meghan sought guidance from Gavin Newsom, but recent reports indicate that he has distanced himself from her.

It is unclear how he could still be guiding her in any capacity.

In 2020, Meghan actively campaigned for Americans to vote in the presidential election, despite her British title at the time.

This move was widely criticized, and the same sentiment applies today.

If she were to enter U.S. politics, conservatives would undoubtedly pressure her to relinquish her royal titles.

However, the assumption that all liberals would support Meghan is misguided.

Many Democrats would view her candidacy as a major mistake, potentially detrimental to their chances of success.

Eric Schiffer, chair of Reputation Management Consultants, believes that Americans will judge Meghan based on her confidence, likability, and commitment to important issues such as the environment, mental health, and equality.

However, Schiffer’s endorsement raises eyebrows, as he is a wealthy Hollywood elite with no real understanding of the concerns of ordinary citizens.

His support for Meghan only reinforces the perception that she would prioritize the interests of the wealthy over those of the general population.

Niall Gardner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, offers a contrasting view.

He argues that Meghan, as a member of the royal family, should not engage in U.S. political activity.

Gardner suggests that she should either relinquish her title or have it removed if she decides to campaign for Joe Biden or other congressional candidates.

This sentiment aligns with the belief that Meghan should not involve herself in politics, given her lack of qualifications and her failure to uphold American values.

Furthermore, Meghan and Harry’s track record raises concerns about their suitability for political involvement.

Harry’s dismissal of freedom of speech as “bonkers” and their attempts to censor individuals on platforms like YouTube undermine their credibility.

Their focus on personal gain and association with questionable figures further erode trust in their intentions.

The couple’s apparent disregard for climate issues, despite their claims of activism, only adds to the skepticism surrounding their political aspirations.

In light of recent global events, it is particularly galling to see Meghan and Harry perpetuating their PR campaigns.

They should acknowledge their diminishing relevance and instead focus on meaningful contributions and genuine assistance to those in need.

The public is growing weary of their self-importance and unsolicited advice.

It is time for them to redirect their efforts towards building a meaningful life and helping others in tangible ways.

What are your thoughts on Meghan and Harry’s political ambitions?

Let us know in the comments below.

And remember to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more insightful content.

Thank you for joining us, and have a great week ahead.

We’ll see you in our next video.