Meghan Markle, the former actress and Duchess of Sussex, has once again found herself at the center of speculation regarding a potential move into U.S. politics.

Despite numerous reasons why this idea seems far-fetched, her PR team continues to push the narrative.

A recent article published by the Express claims that Markle’s political dreams are experiencing a major revival.

However, it remains unclear who exactly is fueling this revival.

The article suggests that Markle was linked to the vacant Senate seat left by the late Dianne Feinstein.

While this may seem like a stretch, the possibility is not entirely ruled out, as Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, could still choose her for the position.

It is worth noting that Newsom has distanced himself from Markle in recent times, refusing to take her calls.

This raises doubts about his involvement in guiding her political aspirations.

Markle’s interest in U.S. politics has been rumored for some time, with speculation fueled primarily by her and her PR team.

Her involvement in encouraging Americans to vote during the 2020 presidential election drew criticism, as it was seen as inappropriate for someone holding a British title to meddle in American politics.

This sentiment remains true today.

If Markle were to enter the political arena, she would undoubtedly face immense pressure from conservatives to relinquish her royal titles.

Contrary to popular belief, not all liberals would be supportive of her political ambitions either.

In fact, many Democrats would view her candidacy as a significant mistake.

Choosing Markle as a candidate could potentially harm their chances of success.

Eric Schiffer, the chair of Reputation Management Consultants, believes that Americans would judge Markle based on her confidence, likability, and dedication to important issues such as the environment, mental health, and equality.

However, Schiffer’s endorsement of Markle should be taken with a grain of salt, as he is a wealthy Hollywood elite residing in Southern California.

His support for her candidacy suggests that she may prioritize the interests of the wealthy over those of ordinary citizens.

Niall Gardner, the director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, opposes the idea of Markle entering U.S. politics.

He argues that as a member of the royal family, she should not engage in political activities.

Furthermore, if she were to campaign for Joe Biden or other congressional candidates, calls for the removal of her title would intensify.

Gardner’s viewpoint aligns with the belief that Markle should not use her royal status to influence American politics.

There is a growing consensus that Markle’s potential political aspirations are misguided.

Her lack of qualifications, coupled with her and Prince Harry’s questionable values, make them unfit for political office.

The couple’s attempts to censor individuals and limit freedom of speech have been met with widespread criticism.

Their focus on personal gain and association with controversial figures raise doubts about their ability to genuinely serve the public.

In light of recent global events, it is even more insulting that Markle and Harry continue to release PR-driven articles.

It is time for them to accept their waning relevance and redirect their efforts towards meaningful endeavors.

Instead of lecturing the public on how to live their lives, they should focus on making a positive impact through tangible actions.

The people have grown tired of their self-importance and empty words.

What are your thoughts on Meghan Markle’s potential political career?

Let us know in the comments section below.

Remember to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more updates.

Thank you for joining us, and we wish you a fantastic week ahead.

Stay tuned for our next video.