In a surprising move, a PR article from Meghan Markle’s camp appeared in Forbes magazine, advocating for Prince Harry and Meghan to take up a role in the US defence industrial complex.
However, the response to this suggestion has been far from positive.
Critics argue that the couple should study history more closely before delving into such a venture.
The article, written by Meghan’s agency, suggests that Prince Harry should undergo a “total system reboot” amidst the ongoing controversy surrounding the recent Royal Tullow book scandal.
With his issues with the royal family now public knowledge, the veteran army officer has an opportunity to pursue a more lasting future as a national security influencer.
Instead of focusing on his fading career as a philanthropist and B-list celebrity, Prince Harry could make a greater impact on the world by pivoting towards defence.
Already involved in veterans affairs, Prince Harry and Meghan could shift their focus towards national security affairs while still addressing their long-standing interests in driving cultural change through compassion.
The source further adds that the Sussex family has ample room to act, especially in light of Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville’s attempts to influence military promotions for woke officers.
By expanding the conversation beyond the revelations about race in the “Endgame” controversy, Prince Harry and Meghan could contribute to a wider context.
However, critics are quick to dismiss the idea, highlighting Prince Harry’s limited advancement within the British army and his lack of experience advising the US defence industrial complex.
They deem it ridiculous to consider him for such a role.
While the US defence industrial complex has largely ignored the news surrounding Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, veterans are expressing their concerns.
One veteran voices discomfort at the thought of Prince Harry and Meghan becoming integral parts of the US military.
They question the couple’s loyalty based on their past actions and express doubts about their ability to keep important secrets and tell the truth.
Another veteran raises concerns about Meghan allegedly taking pictures in secure areas in the UK and questions whether she would do the same on US military bases.
Additionally, they highlight Prince Harry’s admission of using unprescribed substances, questioning how this could benefit national security.
Meghan’s alleged admission of lying to a UK judge under oath also raises doubts about her trustworthiness in handling sensitive information related to national security.
Critics emphasize that the Harkles, as they are often referred to, lack the intelligence, knowledge, and temperament required for such a significant role.
They firmly believe that this scenario will never come to fruition and dismiss any claims suggesting otherwise as having ulterior motives.
However, the couple seems determined to pursue their own path.
They have already found success in other ventures, such as BetterUp securing military contracts with the Department of Defense and Invictus Games.
Time will tell if Meghan’s involvement will interfere with these endeavors, as Prince Harry eagerly seeks IPP status to continue his international travels.
In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s recent PR article advocating for Prince Harry and herself to join the US defence industrial complex has been met with skepticism and criticism.
Critics question their suitability for such roles, citing concerns about loyalty, trustworthiness, and competence.
While the couple remains focused on their own ambitions, it remains to be seen whether their aspirations align with the realities of the military world.