Recently, a statement made by Meghan Markle was denied by the Palace, raising questions about her credibility.

It was claimed that Meghan and her husband, Prince Harry, have never actually lived together as they claim.

Instead, Meghan allegedly stays with their children at a chalet owned by her father-in-law at the San Ysidro Ranch, while Harry is constantly on the move.

However, it has come to light that this information was released by Meghan’s own team, and the domain name of the article was linked to her organization.

Many speculate that this is just another attempt by Meghan to salvage her reputation after a series of recent failures.

She has been spreading rumors about their divorce and positioning herself as the victim who should be supported by King Charles.

The news of Meghan living with the children is seen by some as an effort to prove their existence and quell rumors about her relationship with WME’s CEO.

Unfortunately for Meghan, this PR ploy seems to have backfired as she and her media team at Archworld failed to verify the information about the San Ysidro Ranch.

It turns out that it was King Charles III of Spain who owned the ranch in the 1700s, not King Charles III of England.

It is highly unlikely that the weak-hearted King Charles III of England would provide residence to his grandchildren.

The San Ysidro Ranch, located in the Montecito foothills of the Santa Ynez mountains, is a luxurious resort with a rich history.

Originally deeded with the Presidio by Charles III of Spain, the ranch has changed hands over the years and is now a high-end hotel owned by Ty Warner since 2000.

With only a limited number of expensive rooms, it is highly improbable that anyone would live there full-time, especially with two children.

Such a move would damage Meghan’s reputation and deter other guests from staying at the resort.

It is important to approach this story with skepticism.

The idea of a chalet owned by King Charles III for Meghan seems far-fetched, especially when his own son, Harry, is not even residing there.

Additionally, a royal expert close to the palace reveals that the royal family owns extensive property worldwide, including in the United States.

It is hard to believe that they wouldn’t have some small plot of land in California or other Commonwealth countries.

However, it is clear that the royal family does not own the San Ysidro Ranch cottages; they are part of the resort and not privately owned.

The royal family has been known for their astute management of their wealth, and Harry’s disassociation from his family further isolates him from their financial resources.

This means that Meghan is unlikely to receive the divorce settlement she desires, as neither she nor Harry own any significant assets.

Meghan’s attempt to portray Harry as the one staying at the San Ysidro Ranch is a classic PR spin, trying to reinforce her image as a stable single parent with royal connections.

Based on Harry’s interview at the ranch, he is supposedly staying in the Laurel Cottage, while the largest cottage, the Warner Cottage, with its 6,000 square feet, only has two master bedrooms.

It is evident that Meghan, her two children, and their staff are not living in this cottage.

In conclusion, the claims about Meghan Markle and her family residing at the San Ysidro Ranch appear to be nothing more than a PR stunt.

The facts do not align with the narrative being presented, and it is clear that Meghan’s attempt to use this residence to bolster her image has backfired.