In a surprising revelation, it seems Meghan Markle has a specific preference for how she wants to be addressed.

This tidbit came from Scott Moore, the newly appointed CEO of Prince Harry’s Invictus Games, and it’s sparked quite the conversation.

According to Moore, Meghan’s team has requested that she be referred to as “ma’am.”

Now, isn’t that intriguing?

The choice of title is particularly amusing given the context.

In a typical royal setting, male members of the family are addressed as “Your Royal Highness” followed by “sir,” while female members are referred to as “Your Royal Highness” and then “ma’am.”

However, since Harry and Meghan stepped back from their roles as senior royals, they lost the “Your Royal Highness” designation.

Yet, here we are, with Meghan insisting on a title that seems a bit out of place.

You might wonder why anyone would want to be called “ma’am.”

For many, this term can feel a bit outdated or even patronizing.

It conjures images of southern hospitality, but let’s be honest: who really enjoys being labeled as such?

It’s almost like saying, “Hey, you’re getting older!” It raises the question—does Meghan see herself as someone who needs such formal recognition?

It’s hard not to chuckle at the situation.

Meghan’s insistence on being called “ma’am” feels a tad over-the-top.

After all, she’s not a queen, nor does she hold any official royal duties anymore.

It seems like an attempt to cling to that royal aura, even if the actual royal title is long gone.

One can’t help but think that it reflects a desire to maintain some semblance of royal status, despite the couple’s decision to step away from royal responsibilities.

Harry, on the other hand, appears to be taking a different route.

He has previously expressed a preference for being addressed simply as “Harry.”

This contrast between the two is striking.

While Meghan seems to lean into the formality, Harry appears more inclined to connect with people on a personal level.

Could this difference in approach be indicative of their personalities?

The dynamics at play here raise eyebrows.

It’s almost as if Meghan is trying to uphold a façade of royalty, while Harry is opting for a more relatable persona.

The public perception of Meghan has often been mixed, and her insistence on being called “ma’am” might not help her case.

In a world where authenticity is valued, this choice could be seen as a misstep.

Moreover, there’s an interesting political angle to this discussion.

Recently, Eric Trump made headlines with comments regarding Harry’s visa status, suggesting that not many people care about him.

This statement adds another layer to the ongoing narrative surrounding the couple.

If the general public is indifferent, does it matter what title Meghan prefers?

Despite the scrutiny, Meghan and Harry continue to navigate their new lives in California, balancing their past royal identities with their current endeavors.

The duality of their lives can’t be ignored.

They are still trying to project an image of royalty while distancing themselves from royal duties—an endeavor that seems increasingly complex.

As the dust settles from this latest revelation, one has to wonder: will Meghan’s preference for “ma’am” stick?

Or will it fade into the background as public opinion shifts?

Titles can be powerful, but they can also be burdensome.

In a society that values equality, the need for such formalities may come across as unnecessary.

In the end, whether people choose to address her as “ma’am” or simply “Meghan,” it’s clear that the couple is still very much in the spotlight.

Their choices resonate beyond their immediate circle, sparking discussions about identity, privilege, and the relevance of titles in modern society.

So, what do you think?

Is Meghan right to insist on being called “ma’am,” or is it simply an outdated title that doesn’t fit her current reality?

The conversation is far from over, and as always, your thoughts are welcome.