There have long been rumors and speculations surrounding Meghan Markle’s pregnancy, with some suggesting that she had employed a surrogate to carry her children, Archie and Lilibet.

These rumors gained traction as questions were raised about the birth of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor at Portland Hospital in London.

Now, a certified midwife has come forward to shed light on the situation.

In a post on Quora, the midwife, whose husband is an anaesthetist and an expert in epidural anesthesia, revealed their professional background to establish credibility.

They expressed doubts about Meghan Markle giving birth to a baby and presented their reasons for skepticism.

According to the midwife, Meghan had received pain relief during labor, as confirmed by Prince Harry in his book “Spare.”

The specific drug administered was Entonox, commonly known as laughing gas, which Harry himself admitted to using.

Additionally, Meghan was given oral or injected pain and relaxant medication.

Eventually, a doctor arrived to administer an epidural, which would have paralyzed her lower body, including her legs.

It is possible that the epidural was topped up multiple times, but the exact duration of Meghan’s labor remains unknown.

Based on these details, the midwife concluded that it would be impossible for any woman, as claimed, to walk out of the hospital just two hours after giving birth.

They assert that if the truth is indeed revealed in Harry’s book, then the narrative of Meghan’s swift recovery contradicts reality.

This leads them to question the entire pregnancy, as others have done before.

The air of mystery surrounding Archie began with Meghan’s ever-changing baby bump, which we will delve into shortly.

However, in this first part, the midwife focuses on Harry’s comment about seeing a child change significantly within the first two weeks.

This statement confused many people, raising questions about Archie’s actual age.

However, the birth certificate states that he was born on May 6th.

His public debut occurred approximately two or three days later.

This discrepancy leaves us wondering whether Harry’s comment was a slip of the tongue or an accidental revelation.

Interestingly, Meghan reportedly gave him a look after he made the statement, though this moment was not captured during the press conference.

Adding fuel to the fire, even Meghan’s sister, Samantha Markle, has claimed that Meghan did not give birth to Archie and insinuated the use of a surrogate.

Samantha alleged that the surrogate was initially hesitant to hand over the child, leading Meghan to carry a doll during public appearances to maintain appearances.

“I believe the surrogate has not yet handed over the baby,” Samantha tweeted.

She continued by stating her belief that Archie should not have a title due to her suspicions of surrogacy, and she even claimed that Meghan picked up her eggs in Los Angeles.

Samantha’s tweets gained attention, with her emphasizing the photos showing Meghan’s stomach appearing larger in the morning and flattening by the end of the day.

She also reiterated her claim that Meghan collected her eggs in Los Angeles before Archie’s birth.

Samantha argued that these allegations were significant as they could prevent Meghan and Harry’s children from receiving royal titles, despite the couple already expressing their desire for their children to be without titles.

It is important to note that there is currently no DNA proof confirming Archie’s paternity or verifying that Meghan gave birth to him or Lilibet.

Under British law, proof of delivery from Meghan’s womb is required for titles, according to Samantha.

These claims and uncertainties continue to swirl around Meghan’s pregnancy, leaving many intrigued by the ongoing mystery.

In conclusion, the doubts surrounding Meghan Markle’s pregnancy and the birth of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor persist, with a midwife and Meghan’s own sister adding fuel to the speculation.